LightFantastic
- 41
- 0
How did Hertz do it with his spark gap transmitter?
The discussion revolves around the operation of Hertz's spark gap transmitter, focusing on the generation of alternating current (AC) and the mechanisms of radiation in electromagnetic (EM) waves. Participants explore the nature of the current produced, the necessity of storing AC, and the principles behind RF energy radiation, with references to both historical and modern contexts.
Participants express multiple competing views regarding the nature of the current generated by the spark gap transmitter and the mechanisms of radiation. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus on the necessity or efficiency of the spark gap in generating RF energy.
Participants highlight limitations in understanding the relationship between DC and AC, the role of inductors and capacitors in RF generation, and the historical context of Hertz's experiments. There are unresolved questions about the terminology used to describe the current and radiation processes.
LightFantastic said:Http://youtu.be/NoeuVxYoNio?t=6m15s
6:21 he generates an alternating current which runs alomg these rods and acoss a gap...
Dang you, Jim! Generates an alternating current? Talk about misleading... more like a temporary AC from a DC source
LightFantastic said:Well I've never quoted myself before. Isn't this incorrect? Current in a DC battery never changes direction, therefore it is not AC in nature. Is there a better term for this?
Also,
If I tap the leads of a 9V, not only will current flow, but I will also get radiation. This radiation will seize to radiate when the current IS flowing.
Why?
Because once set in motion, the electrons can argue that they are at rest, and it is everything else that is moving.
Question
If I disconnect the leads from the 9V, I should get radiation again, correct?
How should I explain to someone the source of radiation? Movement of charge? I think that is misleading. How about when charge changes its state of motion?
sophiecentaur said:The example of a Spark Transmitter is not the best one to use to get an understanding of how RF power can be radiated
I think you are confused because you are trying to understand something that is too far down the line from your present state of knowledge. It has already been mentioned that the act of interrupting the flow of Direct Current in a circuit will produce a high voltage spike, The energy in this spike happens to contain non-DC components (RF), which is what can be fed to an antenna, when you use a suitable Inductor and Capacitor. You just have to accept this unless you want to learn some basics of circuits and circuit components. Just look at all the images that a google search of "spark gap transmitter" will show you. There is more to the circuit than just a battery with a switch.And thus my confusion with Hertz and his gap. I see no reason for it.