Storing Antimatter: Possibility of Containment and Current Research

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter |mathematix|
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antimatter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of containing antimatter, the current research efforts related to antimatter, and the methods of its production on Earth. It explores theoretical and practical challenges in antimatter containment and production, including the feasibility of creating antimatter without particle accelerators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire about the possibility of containing antimatter without it interacting with matter and mention ongoing research in the field.
  • It is noted that tiny amounts of antimatter can be stored for short durations, with specific mention of antiprotons being kept circulating for extended periods in particle accelerators.
  • Participants discuss the methods of containment, such as magnetic confinement in a vacuum, and raise questions about the containment of uncharged antimatter.
  • There are claims regarding the energy produced from all antimatter created on Earth being sufficient to heat a cup of coffee, which some participants agree is a good approximation.
  • Concerns are raised about the economic feasibility of producing antimatter, with estimates suggesting that the costs could reach billions to trillions of dollars for a single gram, depending on production efficiency.
  • Some participants speculate about the potential for completely new, undiscovered physics to enable more efficient antimatter production.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility of antimatter containment and production, with no consensus reached on the economic viability or the potential for new technologies to emerge.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations in current knowledge regarding the production and containment of uncharged antimatter and the high costs associated with antimatter production, which remain unresolved.

|mathematix|
Messages
46
Reaction score
2
Is it possible to contain a sample of antimatter without it interacting and annihilating with matter?
Is there any research going into antimatter at the moment? Is it possible to create antimatter on Earth without using a particle accelerator?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tiny amounts of antimatter (of the order of 1000 atoms) can be stored for something like 15 minutes.
More details
Is there any research going into antimatter at the moment?
Sure.

Is it possible to create antimatter on Earth without using a particle accelerator?
Beta+ decays produce positrons without particle accelerators.
For antiprotons, you need a particle accelerator.
 
|mathematix| said:
Is it possible to contain a sample of antimatter without it interacting and annihilating with matter?
When the Tevatron was still operational, antiprotons were kept circulating in its main ring for ~10-12 hours at a time.
 
Right, it is easier with antiprotons alone. You can even trap them for several months.
 
Are they contained using using magnetic confinement in a vacuum? What about uncharged antimatter, is it possible to contain it?
I read that all the antimatter ever produce on Earth produces enough energy to heat a cup of coffee.
Is it theoretically possible to produce antimatter economically and efficiently? Theoretically, what kind of technology would allow? Or is it so difficult that not even in a billion years we can create such technology?
Thank you for the replies :)
 
Last edited:
|mathematix| said:
What about uncharged antimatter, is it possible to contain it?
See post 2.

I read that all the antimatter ever produce on Earth produces enough energy to heat a cup of coffee.
That is a good approximation, indeed.

Is it theoretically possible to produce antimatter economically and efficiently?
Economically for which application? No matter how you produce it (given the current knowledge of physics), it is very expensive.
The pure energy costs of 1gram of antimatter are several million dollars, take the production efficiency into account and you get a number in the billions to trillions. For a single gram! That is a bit more energy than the first nuclear weapon had. And the storage problem is another issue.

Theoretically, what kind of technology would allow?
Particle accelerators. Or completely new, undiscovered physics.
 
mfb said:
Or completely new, undiscovered physics.

I am very curious! Most likely will never find out :(
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K