Straight to PhD after undergrad in physics and math?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the differences between master's and PhD programs in physics and mathematics, particularly focusing on the pathways available for students transitioning from undergraduate studies to graduate programs. Participants explore the perceptions of master's degrees, their value, and the structure of graduate programs in these fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that a master's degree in physics is viewed as a "consolation prize" and may not be necessary for a career in academia, where a PhD is often preferred.
  • Others argue that a master's degree still represents significant work and can be valuable in industrial and teaching positions.
  • It is noted that some programs allow students to enter directly into a PhD program, while others require a master's degree first, with the possibility of upgrading to a PhD later based on performance.
  • Participants mention that in some schools, a master's degree can be awarded after completing certain coursework and qualifiers, reinforcing the idea of it being a fallback for those who do not complete their PhD.
  • There is a distinction made between "terminal" master's degrees, which focus on specific applications and may require a thesis, and master's degrees obtained during a PhD program.
  • One participant raises a question about whether the same perceptions and structures apply to mathematics programs as they do to physics programs.
  • A participant from the UK shares a different perspective, indicating that the application process may differ, with a focus on applying for a master's degree first.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the value and perception of master's degrees in relation to PhD programs. There is no consensus on whether the characterization of master's degrees as "consolation prizes" is universally accepted, and the applicability of these views to mathematics programs remains uncertain.

Contextual Notes

Limitations in the discussion include varying definitions of what constitutes a master's degree and the differences in program structures across institutions and countries. The discussion does not resolve how these factors influence the perceived value of master's versus PhD degrees.

Nilpotent
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey-

I've read these forums for a couple of months, I'm sort of a nerd, so i enjoy working out problems even if i never post solutions to them. :).

Anyways, I do have a question.

I was wondering about the difference between masters and PhD programs in physics and mathematics. I've heard several of the faculty in the physics department mention that a masters in physics is sort of a consolation prize. So are there phd programs that you go to straight out of undergrad, or is that something they're lying to me about? the same question goes for math.

thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wouldn't call a master's degree a consolation prize.

A master's program is the shorter of the two graduate programs. It generally takes about 2-3 years to complete, and may or may not involve research. Some are completely course-based while others have a research component. At the end you have a graduate degree, but its value in academia (pursuing a position as a professor for example) is limited. It does however certify an advanced understanding of the field which can be valuable in industrial and teaching positions.

A PhD takes longer (4-6+) years, and requires more research. Ph.D. students are often expected to be more independent than master's students.

Some schools will allow students to jump right into a Ph.D. program, while in others you enter as a master's student and based on your performance in the first year or so, you can 'upgrade' to the Ph.D. program. The advantage of doing a master's degree first is that it allows one to try out a field without making a 4+ year committment to it. The advantage of doing the Ph.D. straight out of undergrad is that it can be faster.
 
Some schools/departments do not have a master's program, only a Ph.D. However, these schools often allow students to petition for the award of a master's degree after a certain point in the program (usually after completing coursework and qualifiers). At such schools, the master's degree is usually viewed as a "consolation prize" for students unable to complete their Ph.D.

A master's degree still represents a non-trivial amount of work though.

EDIT: I'm originally from computer science.
 
Last edited:
Based on what I've heard: the usual path is to go from an undergrad degree directly into a PhD program, and in fact most graduate programs in physics only offer the PhD program. If you want to make a career in physics, you apply to grad school to get a PhD, not just a master's. So in that sense, a master's degree would be a "consolation prize." Of course, again, that's based on what I've heard...
 
This is what i thought to be true, and of course, a masters degree represents many years of work, i didn't mean to trivialize it at all, i simply meant that it isn't something that is often attained anymore.

Are these things true for mathematics programs as well, or are the answers here mostly based on physics programs?
 
There are basically two kinds of master's degrees (in the U.S. at least). At some/many schools, you can "pick up" a master's degree along the way during a Ph.D. program, usually after you've completed a certain number of hours of coursework. That's how I got my master's. It's sometimes considered a "consolation prize" in the sense that if you end up not finishing your Ph.D. for some reason, at least you still have the master's degree.

There are also "terminal" master's degrees, which often focus on a specific application area (e.g. medical physics), have specific course requirements in that area, and which often require you to complete a thesis or some kind of project in addition to your coursework. If you wanted to continue to a Ph.D. after one of those, I think you normally have to apply for the Ph.D. program and be considered in the same pool as people coming straight from a bachelor's degree.

My experience is with physics programs. The pattern may vary in other fields.
 
Hmm that's strange, I think here in the UK you mainly apply for a masters degree (although you can do the three year one aswell) and apply for a PhD from there, not sure though.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 50 ·
2
Replies
50
Views
12K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K