Strange fluid-mechanics formula made by crazy textbook author

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of surface tension and its role in fluid mechanics, specifically regarding the balance of forces in a tube as described in Frank M. White's textbook "Fluid Mechanics." Participants clarify that the vertical component of the surface tension force at the interface indeed balances the weight of the fluid column, while also highlighting the significance of capillary action. The conversation emphasizes that surface tension is a fundamental property of fluids, regardless of the tube material, and that it can lead to unique behaviors such as the depression of mercury in capillary tubes. The consensus is that a more thorough explanation of these mechanisms is necessary in educational materials.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid mechanics principles, particularly surface tension.
  • Familiarity with capillary action and its implications in fluid dynamics.
  • Knowledge of pressure differences in closed and open systems.
  • Basic grasp of the properties of fluids, including polar and non-polar substances.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of capillary action in various fluids, including water and mercury.
  • Study the effects of surface tension on fluid behavior in different tube materials.
  • Explore the mathematical modeling of forces in fluid columns using Bernoulli's equation.
  • Examine alternative fluid mechanics textbooks, such as "Fluid Mechanics" by Cengel & Cimbala, for comprehensive explanations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, physics, and fluid dynamics who seek to deepen their understanding of surface tension and capillary action in fluid mechanics.

Nikitin
Messages
734
Reaction score
27
Please look at the picture I uploaded.
attachment.php?attachmentid=61194&d=1377612599.jpg


Can somebody explain to me how the author of my book can claim that the "vertical component of the ring surface-tension force at the interface in the tube balances the weight of the column of fluid of height h"? This stuff is weird. How can TENSION FORCES which are on the TOP of a column of fluid support the weight of the column?

I mean, it's obviously the pressure-difference between the air inside the tube and outside which lifts the water, assuming that the tube is closed on the top.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.jpg
    Untitled.jpg
    34.8 KB · Views: 712
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The tube need not be closed at the top. The air pressure is equal at the top of the fluid in the tube and at its base outside. So there must be something else that counteracts the weight of the fluid in the tube. This is what the author states.
 
Then how does it work? Does the fluid actually "stick" to the sides of the tubes, and thus drags some of the rest of the fluid along with it? So, if you lift the tube very carefully, theoretically the water would stick to it?

How can the fluid, say H2O, stick to a normal glass or plastic tube? I mean neither of those substances are polarized...

And can somebody pls help me here too? https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=4484367#post4484367
 
Hmm, thanks. But 2 questions remain:

1) Why is the surface-tension connecting the water to the tube-wall the same as the regular surface-tension?

2) Doesn't this mean that there will be a tension vertically throughout the water, which lifts the water up the tube?
 
Given how the solution is framed in your book, I would expect that it should have an explanation of the mechanism before it plunges into the calculation. Is it completely silent on that?
 
1. surface tension is surface tension. It's the fluid and the size (diameter) of the tube which produces this phenomenon.

2. At least in the tube.

Weird corollary to capillary action. When the fluid is mercury, Cap Action produces a depression in the fluid level relative to the level of the rest of the liquid.
 
voko said:
Given how the solution is framed in your book, I would expect that it should have an explanation of the mechanism before it plunges into the calculation. Is it completely silent on that?

The book we use is called Fluid Mechanics by Frank M. White, and it is only fit as firewood.

Anyway I have understood this subject thanks to you guys and Cengel & Cimbala's far superior text on fluid mechanics. thanks :)
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
906
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
27K