Other Strange paper status change at the journal

  • Thread starter Thread starter patric44
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Publication
AI Thread Summary
A user expressed concern about their paper submitted to "Physica Scripta," which changed status from "1st reviewer agreed to report" back to "out for review" after 15 days. This raised questions about potential issues with the review process. Responses highlighted that various factors could cause delays or changes in status, such as disagreements between reviewers, conflicts of interest, or a referee realizing the paper was outside their expertise. It was noted that reviewers can decline after initially accepting, and that the review process is inherently unpredictable. The median time for submission to decision is 52 days, suggesting that 25 days is not unusual for a review. Participants advised focusing on future work rather than worrying about the current submission.
patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
Hello every one
I submitted a paper to the journal "Physica Scripta" 25 days ago, the status was "out for review" then changed to "1st reviewer agreed to report" and after 15 days instead of "1st reviewer reports received", it changed to "out for review" again?!, can any one explain what could be the problem here
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Vanadium 50 said:
Based on your posting here and your attempt to send substantially similar papers to two different journals, it is possible that you got caught at it.

This can happen when both journals send the papers to the same referee (who is presumably an expert, so this is not unlikely) and he responds "What the heck?"
Please don't through accusations who said the two papers are substantially similar! you never saw them, plus I never send it. Now to my main question, can the reviewer decline the invitation after accepting it, is that common in the literature
 
There are plenty of reasons that a review can go sideways without it necessarily reflecting on the quality of the paper.
 
If you want to know, call the editor.

If you don't want people to guess, don't ask us to guess. Lordy.

If you check the journal's home page they say 52 days is the median submission to decision after review. Fretting after 25 days makes no sense.
 
  • Like
Likes patric44, CalcNerd and berkeman
There are too many things that could be going on behind the scenes, and as said, they may or may not have anything to do with the paper. Consider...
  • Referee 1 and Referee 2 disagree substantially. When this happens, often the paper will go out to a mediating Referee 3.
  • A referee agrees to do a review and then, on reading the work in detail, realizes there is a conflict of interest and bows out of the process.
  • A referee could have agreed to do the review, and then on reading the paper in detail, realized it was out of their field of expertise and then reported to the journal as much.
  • Sometimes referees can agree to do the review and then just not report back. It's a volunteer process. Sometimes life happens.
  • The associate editor may not have felt one of the reviews was appropriate and so they sent it back out.
  • The wrong paper could have been sent out for review.
Until the paper comes back, you really can't speculate. It's in the box and both dead and alive at once. It's best to spend your time working on the next paper.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes patric44, Nik_2213 and DaveE
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?
Back
Top