Strange radio signal from Proxima Centauri

In summary: Although the press reports are a bit unclear on exactly how and when Parkes detected the signal, it apparently showed up during five 30-minute periods over several days, all while the telescope was pointing directly at Proxima. Notably, when the telescope was turned away from the star, the signal vanished.The signal was detected for 5 consecutive 30 minute periods. The origin of the signal is tightly constrained within 16' of the star.
  • #1
DavidCummings
5
5
TL;DR Summary
Interested in opinions regarding the radio signal from Proxima Centauri.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/...66Wbqql-hoo91hA1WnCl9Azwqa84ly-zS6cjBiDFzlK8o

Excerpt:

Most curiously, it occupies a very narrow band of the radio spectrum: 982 megahertz, specifically, which is a region typically bereft of transmissions from human-made satellites and spacecraft . “We don’t know of any natural way to compress electromagnetic energy into a single bin in frequency” such as this one, Siemion says. Perhaps, he says, some as-yet-unknown exotic quirk of plasma physics could be a natural explanation for the tantalizingly concentrated radio waves. But “for the moment, the only source that we know of is technological.”
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2, Jarvis323, hmmm27 and 2 others
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2
They didn't give the bandwidth. That would be an interesting fact. But it has no modulation and it drifts. Those facts don't suggest ETI, so it's most likely natural. It sounds like they have almost ruled out Earth sources. If they do, it is something that will teach us something with enough study.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and DavidCummings
  • #3
Does anyone know if the data available to download somewhere?
 
  • #4
StandardsGuy said:
They didn't give the bandwidth. That would be an interesting fact. But it has no modulation and it drifts. Those facts don't suggest ETI, so it's most likely natural. It sounds like they have almost ruled out Earth sources. If they do, it is something that will teach us something with enough study.
Thanks for bringing up the points about modulation and drift. That's interesting.
 
  • #5
StandardsGuy said:
it has no modulation and it drifts.
Are the drifts regular or irregular? If regular, it could be related to planet orbital effects.
 
  • #6
Unknown. I take it the signal has not been re-observed.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/alien-hunters-detect-mysterious-radio-signal-from-nearby-star/ar-BB1c3rJU
 
  • #7
Until scientists proved that there is civilization in Alpha Centauri, these signals mean nothing. However, I don't deny the possibility of reaching this star system in the far future. I heard that uncrewed mission to Alpha Centauri for 2069. Btw, I think many new space agencies and aerospace companies will become leaders by that time. I have high hopes for a British rocket manufacturing company; I'm sure that someone here has probably heard about it. They also use innovative technologies; therefore, I think it would be a good decision for all leading space agencies to work together and achieve better results. Who knows, perhaps, Alpha Centauri is closer than it seems.
 
  • #8
SpaceJacob said:
Until scientists proved that there is civilization in Alpha Centauri, these signals mean nothing. ...

It is a unique data point that has never been observed before. Hard to get more significant and meaningful in astronomy.
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, berkeman and Delta2
  • #9
stefan r said:
Hard to get more significant and meaningful in astronomy.
I'd have to argue with that. For significance, you need corroboration / repeatability and a one-off doesn't have that. It's worth pointing out that only the direction of the source can be measured and if the observation is brief, there is no clue about the actual distance. Moreover, the directivity of RF receiving antenna is usually pretty poor so the signal definitely came from 'somewhere in that sort of direction' .
 
  • #10
This so-called result has not been published, so we're just talking about rumor. Although @sophiecentaur , the angular resolution of radio telescopes might be better than you think. It's about an arcsecond for the best arrays - better than your eyeball.
 
  • #11
Vanadium 50 said:
the angular resolution of radio telescopes might be better than you think. It's about an arcsecond for the best arrays - better than your eyeball.
I wasn't sure about the numbers involved but, looking at Hubble and other images, I can see many more than just one star in a radius of 1 arc second. Whilst the most obvious candidate would be the brightest (and often the nearest), visually, that's not a clincher.
 
  • #12
Again, it might be better than you think. We don't know what measurements were made or when they were made (because we don't have a paper - just rumors), but Proxima Centauri is moving against the background stars at an arcsecond every few months.
 
  • #13
Vanadium 50 said:
Again, it might be better than you think. We don't know what measurements were made or when they were made (because we don't have a paper - just rumors), but Proxima Centauri is moving against the background stars at an arcsecond every few months.
Bah! Too danged clever for their own good, these Astronomers. They are champions of lateral thinking and can get all sorts of information out of what they see. Proper motion, then...

How long was the source detected for?
 
  • #14
sophiecentaur said:
How long was the source detected for?

We don't know. No paper. Just rumors.

And while most motion is proper motion, parallax is not hugely smaller.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
  • #15
sophiecentaur said:
How long was the source detected for?

From astronomy.com:
Although the press reports are a bit unclear on exactly how and when Parkes detected the signal, it apparently showed up during five 30-minute periods over several days, all while the telescope was pointing directly at Proxima. Notably, when the telescope was turned away from the star, the signal vanished. Ultimately, the signal’s origin appears tightly constrained within a 16'-wide circle — roughly half the size of the Full Moon — around Proxima Centauri on the sky.
sophiecentaur said:
I'd have to argue with that. For significance, you need corroboration / repeatability and a one-off doesn't have that. It's worth pointing out that only the direction of the source can be measured and if the observation is brief, there is no clue about the actual distance. Moreover, the directivity of RF receiving antenna is usually pretty poor so the signal definitely came from 'somewhere in that sort of direction' .

All data points need to be corroborated and repeated. But all repeated measurements had to be measured once before they could be repeated.

The signal originating from a planet orbiting Proxima Centauri is among the most mundane options. A radio signal originating in our own Oort cloud would be a big deal. Would be the first directly detected object in the Oort cloud. A signal originating from the Carina-Sagittarius arm would need to be a huge transmitter. If transmitters are "lurking about" near the Great Emu we really need to figure out what they are, why they are lurking, and which way are they moving. Any distance (except inside Earth orbit) is interesting and should be observed more closely.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur

What is the source of the strange radio signal from Proxima Centauri?

The source of the strange radio signal is still unknown. It is believed to be coming from Proxima Centauri, the closest star to our solar system, but the exact origin is yet to be determined.

What makes this radio signal strange or unusual?

This radio signal is unusual because it has a distinct pattern and frequency that is not consistent with any known natural or artificial sources. It also appears to be originating from a relatively close star, which is uncommon for radio signals.

Could this radio signal be a sign of extraterrestrial life?

While it is a possibility, it is important to approach this with caution and not jump to conclusions. The signal could have a natural explanation or be a result of human interference. More research and analysis is needed to determine the true nature of the signal.

How do scientists plan to investigate this strange radio signal?

Scientists are using various telescopes and instruments to study and analyze the signal. They are also collaborating with other experts in the field to gather more data and come up with possible explanations for the signal.

What impact could this strange radio signal have on our understanding of the universe?

If the signal is confirmed to be of extraterrestrial origin, it could potentially be a groundbreaking discovery and greatly impact our understanding of the universe and the possibility of other life forms beyond Earth. Even if the signal has a natural or human-made explanation, it could still provide valuable insights into the workings of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
2
Replies
63
Views
10K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
10
Views
10K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
9
Views
5K
Back
Top