Strange Tetrad Form of Einstein-Hilbert Action

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bolbteppa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Strange Tetrad
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the representation of the Einstein-Hilbert action using a tetrad formalism, specifically expressed as S = ∫ d^n x e R(e_{\mu} \, ^a, \omega_{\mu a} \, ^b (e)). This formulation includes the linearized version of teleparallel gravity, where the torsion tensor T_{\mu \nu} \, ^a is defined as T_{\mu \nu} \, ^a = ∂_{\mu} e_{\nu} \, ^a - ∂_{\nu} e_{\mu} \, ^a. The spin connection is derived from the vielbein and is crucial for understanding the action's quadratic nature. References to Samtleben's "Introduction to Supergravity" and a paper on teleparallel gravity provide additional context and clarity on the subject.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Einstein-Hilbert action
  • Familiarity with tetrads and vielbeins in general relativity
  • Knowledge of spin connections and their role in curvature
  • Basic concepts of teleparallel gravity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Einstein-Hilbert action in tetrad formalism
  • Explore the linearized version of teleparallel gravity in detail
  • Examine the vielbein formalism as presented in Samtleben's "Introduction to Supergravity"
  • Investigate the relationship between torsion and curvature in the context of general relativity
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, researchers in general relativity, and students interested in advanced gravitational theories, particularly those exploring the interplay between curvature and torsion in spacetime formulations.

bolbteppa
Messages
300
Reaction score
41
I have seen it the claimed that the Einstein-Hilbert action can be written in terms of a tetrad ##e_{\mu} \, ^a## as
\begin{align}
S &= \int d^n x \, e R(e_{\mu} \, ^a, \omega_{\mu a} \, ^b (e)) \\
&= \int d^n x \, e (T_{ca} \, ^a T^{cb} \, _{b} - \frac{1}{2} T_{ab \ c} T^{ac \ b} - \frac{1}{4} T_{ab \ c} T^{ab \ c}),
\end{align}
where
$$T_{\mu \nu} \, ^a = \partial_{\mu} e_{\nu} \, ^a - \partial_{\nu} e_{\mu} \, ^a$$

and the spin connection is

$$ \omega_{\mu b c} = \frac{1}{2}(e^{\rho} \, _b \partial_{\mu} e_{\rho c} - e^{\rho} \, _c \partial_{\mu} e_{\rho b}) - \frac{1}{2}(e^{\rho} \, _b \partial_{\rho} e_{\mu c} - e^{\rho} \, _c \partial_{\rho} e_{\mu b} ) \\ - \frac{1}{2}(e^{\lambda} \, _b e^{\rho} \, _c \partial_{\lambda} e_{\rho a} - e^{\lambda} \, _c e^{\rho} \, _b \partial_{\lambda} e_{\rho a})e_{\mu} \, ^a ?$$
I have never seen this form of the action before, and have not studied much on tetrad's yet, is there a reference to a derivation/explanation of this form of the action which seems nice and quadratic?

(Edit, fixed initial mistake in action, thank you).

Edit 2, apparently it's a linearized version of teleparallel gravity https://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0304067.pdf
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Who is the C tensor/tensor-like object?
 
Maybe my insight helps a little bit:

https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/general-relativity-gauge-theory/

Also, check out Samtleben's Introduction to Supergravity, which has a very clear exposure of the vielbein formalism and 1st vs 2nd order formalism.

I haven't checked your second equation, but usually one rewrites the Riemann tensor in terms of the spin connection curvature, and then constructs the Ricci scalar out of it. Your T seems to be the linearized curvature of the Vielbein (the "torsion"), such that the spin connection contributions are higher order and drop out. I'm a bit puzzled by your action (2), but probably this is because it's a linearization.

The spin connection is usually solved by the constraint that the vielbein curvature (the "torsion") vanishes. In the first order formalism this is done by varying the action wrt the spin connection.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
477
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K