Why Does the Stream Function Calculation Differ in Batchelor's Example?

Click For Summary
In Batchelor's example, the stream function is calculated using the relationship between velocity components u and v, leading to a discrepancy in values. The initial calculations yield v = -3x^2y and u = x^3, while further differentiation suggests v = -6x^2y and u = 2x^3, indicating a factor of two difference. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding partial differentiation and the need to include an arbitrary function when integrating partial differential equations. To resolve the inconsistency, additional information about the flow conditions, such as irrotational flow, is necessary. This highlights the complexity of fluid dynamics and the need for careful application of mathematical principles.
tiredryan
Messages
50
Reaction score
0
In Batchelor's text (2000) on page 76, the stream function is defined as

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = \int\left(u dy - v dx\right)<br />

where \psi_0 is a constant

Now I begin with a simple function for u where

<br /> u = x^3<br />

From mass conservation,

<br /> \frac{\partial u}{\partial x} + \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = 0<br />

<br /> 3x^2 + \frac{\partial v}{\partial y} = 0<br />

<br /> v = -3x^2y<br />

Plugging this into the equation for the stream function

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = \int\left(u dy - v dx\right)<br />

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = \int\left(x^3 dy + 3x^2y dx\right)<br />

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = \int\left(x^3 dy\right) + \int\left(3x^2y dx\right)<br />

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = x^3y + x^3y + C<br />

<br /> \psi - \psi_0 = 2x^3y + C<br />

Now using the equations for u and v,

<br /> u = \frac{\partial \psi}{\partial y}<br />

<br /> u = \frac{\partial (2x^3y + C - \psi_0)}{\partial y}<br />

<br /> u = 2x^3<br />

<br /> v = -\frac{\partial \psi}{\partial x}<br />

<br /> v = -\frac{\partial (2x^3y + C - \psi_0)}{\partial x}<br />

<br /> v = -6x^2y<br />

I seems like the initial v=-3x^2y and u=x^3 are off from the recalculated v = -6x^2y and u = 2x^3 by a factor of two. Am I doing something wrong? Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hello Ryan.

First off I recommend revising partial differentiation and partial differential equations.

In general with ordinary differential equations we add an arbitrary constant when we integrate them.

With partials you add an arbitrary function.

So your solution of the continuity equation should be

\begin{array}{l}<br /> \frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial y}}\quad = \quad - 3{x^2} \\ <br /> v\quad = \quad - 3{x^2}y\quad + \quad P(x) \\ <br /> \end{array}

Where P(x) is an arbitrary function of x alone.

You can see that if this is so then differentiation with respect to y will yield the same result, for any P(x) whatsoever.

Now you need more information to evalutate P(x)

I suggest you read on a few pages and try the condition for irrotational flow.
I'm afraid Batchelor makes a bit of a meal of it but the condition boils down to

\frac{{\partial u}}{{\partial y}}\quad = \quad \frac{{\partial v}}{{\partial x}}
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K