Stress forces on aluminum tubings

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on comparing the strength of two types of aluminum tubing, specifically 6061-T6 aluminum. The first option is a 2-inch outer diameter round tube with a wall thickness of 0.083 inches and a cross-sectional area of 0.500 square inches. The second option is a 1.25-inch outer square tube with a wall thickness of 1.125 inches and a cross-sectional area of 0.563 square inches. According to user mibiz1, the round tube is significantly stronger than the square tube for withstanding various stress forces including axial, radial, torsional, shear, tear, and bending.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stress analysis in materials
  • Familiarity with aluminum alloy properties, specifically 6061-T6
  • Knowledge of cross-sectional area calculations
  • Basic principles of structural engineering
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanical properties of aluminum 6061-T6
  • Learn about stress calculations for different shapes and materials
  • Explore the effects of wall thickness on structural integrity
  • Investigate design considerations for axial and torsional loads
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, material scientists, and project managers involved in structural design and analysis, particularly those working with aluminum materials.

mibiz1
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Please forgive me if this post is in the wrong section. I'm interested in working on a project but my physics is very rusty in terms of calculating stress and in need of help. I would like to know which is better given the below aluminum 6061-T6 tubing with similar weights to withstand all stress forces axial, radial/torsional, sheer, tear, bend, etc... for an approximate tube length of about 60 inches:

2 inch outer diameter round tube with 0.083 wall thickness - cross sectional area of 0.500

versus

1.25 in outer square tube with 1.125 wall thickness - cross sectional area of 0.563

Thanks for your help.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
mibiz1: Globally, the round tube listed in post 1 currently appears to be significantly stronger than the square tube listed in post 1.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
24K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K