How Does Stretching a Polymer Relate to Hooke's Law?

  • Thread starter Thread starter CottonHill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polymer
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the relationship between stretching a polymer and Hooke's Law, specifically through the equation F = (kBT/P)*((1/4)*(Lo2/(L-Δl)2-(1/4)+(Δl/L)). Key variables include F (force), T (temperature), kB (Boltzmann's constant), P (persistence length), Lo (contour length), and Δl (amount of stretch). The analysis demonstrates that as Δl approaches zero and Lo approaches infinity, the force simplifies to F = (kB*T)/P, which aligns with Hooke's Law. The effective spring constant can be derived from this relationship, confirming the connection between polymer stretching and spring mechanics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hooke's Law and its mathematical formulation.
  • Familiarity with thermodynamic concepts, particularly Boltzmann's constant.
  • Knowledge of polymer physics, including persistence length and contour length.
  • Basic calculus for limits and approximations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of Hooke's Law in the context of polymer physics.
  • Study the implications of Boltzmann's constant in statistical mechanics.
  • Explore the concept of persistence length in polymers and its significance.
  • Investigate experimental methods for measuring the spring constant of polymer molecules.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in polymer science, physicists studying material properties, and engineers involved in materials design will benefit from this discussion.

CottonHill
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
The question tells me that some experiments have shown that the force needed to stretch a polymer molecule by an amount (Δl) is given approximately by:

F= (kBT/P)*((1/4)*(Lo2/(L-Δl)2-(1/4)+(Δl/L))

Yea, I know, nasty looking. Anywho:

F = Force
T = Temp.
kB = Boltzmann's Constant
P = Persistence Length
Lo = Contour Length
Δl = Amount of Stretch of Polymer Molecule

After giving all of that lovely info, the question says to show that if Δl is small relative to Lo, it approximates Hooke's Law. Then it asks to find the effective spring constant of the molecule.


So far I have taken that equation and said if Δl approaches zero and L0 approaches ∞ then we get down to:

F=(kB*T)/P

I can explain that Hooke's Law says that a force (F) equals a constant relating to energy of a spring (k) times the distance (x)...
And that relates to the above equation by having a force (F) equals a constant relating to energy of stretching (kB) times a a distance (P). Ignoring T.

Is my logic correct and how would I find the spring constant of this molecule? Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't understand F is a constant. Does that mean F is non-zero even when Δl is zero ? You say
So far I have taken that equation and said if Δl approaches zero and L0 approaches ∞ then we get down to:
F=(kB*T)/P
This is true, but it's not the same as taking the limit ##{\Delta {\rm l}\over {\rm L}}\, \rightarrow 0##

(Note you don't want L ##\rightarrow \infty##)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K