String Theory and Twistor Theory Combined

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between twistor theory, as proposed by Roger Penrose, and string theory, notably associated with Ed Witten. Participants explore the inconsistencies between these theories and recent developments that may bridge them, focusing on theoretical implications and historical context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that twistor theory and string theory have historically been inconsistent, highlighting the dimensional differences between the two frameworks.
  • Another participant questions the timeline of recent developments regarding the correspondence between twistor theory and string theory.
  • A reference to a talk by Roger Penrose is provided, suggesting that the correspondence may have been discussed recently, potentially reigniting interest in twistor theory.
  • A participant clarifies that their description of the inconsistency between twistor theory and string theory is based on Penrose's statements, not their own conclusions, emphasizing Penrose's positive outlook on Witten's involvement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express uncertainty about the timeline of developments and the nature of the correspondence between the two theories. There is no consensus on the implications of these developments or their significance.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention limitations in accessing certain references and the potential for miscommunication regarding the timeline of events related to the theories.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in theoretical physics, particularly those exploring the intersections of twistor theory and string theory, may find this discussion relevant.

Naty1
Messages
5,605
Reaction score
40
Until recently the twistor theory of Roger Penrose on one hand and string theory on another, epitomized by Ed Witten and many others, have been inconsistent.

Twistor space uses 3+1 dimensions and is a complex space in additional dimensions with imaginary components, analogous to the complex number structure of quantum theory. String theory has I guess now 10 +1 real dimensions...although that can vary by theory. Twistors give rise to spin networks which have been discussed in other threads here.

According the a one line comment from Roger Penrose in a video from another thread here, Ed Witten has sent Penrose a 100 page document placing strings in twistor space...unsure when, sounds like in the last year or so.

And apparently some insightful ideas arise...anyone know anything more or have any references for reading??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The reference was in a talk at Penn State June last year by Roger Penrose...honoring Abhay Ashtekar...Penrose made it sound like the correpoondence was a recent event that might restimulate interest in his twistor theory...The website has caused my computer to lock up three times just now , so I'll try again tomorrow.
 
I forgot to mention in my original post that the second paragraph desription of twistor theory's inconsistency with string theory in my original post is what I believe Roger Penrose said in a video related to another thread...it's his summary of the situation, not a conclusion I drew...Penrose he was of course ebullient that a guy of Witten's stature might "resurrect" the old twistor theory...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
9K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
9K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
13K