Structure of the Week: Is 5 Days Work & 2 Days Rest a Good Idea?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ehrenfest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Structure
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the structure of the workweek, specifically the common model of 5 days of work followed by 2 days of rest. Participants explore its implications for lifestyle, productivity, and personal preferences, touching on various alternatives and experiences related to work schedules.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express satisfaction with the 5-day workweek, suggesting it promotes a healthy lifestyle.
  • Others argue that having two consecutive days off is beneficial for activities like camping or short trips.
  • Concerns are raised about the limited vacation time associated with traditional work schedules, with some expressing a desire for more vacation days.
  • Several participants propose alternative work schedules, such as four 10-hour workdays with three days off, citing benefits like reduced commuting costs.
  • Some participants share personal experiences with different work schedules, including a 4-3 workweek, and discuss the challenges of transitioning back to work after weekends.
  • There is mention of varying work schedules in different contexts, such as military service, and how these might not be suitable for everyone.
  • Some participants express confusion about the thread's title, expecting a discussion about physical structures rather than work schedules.
  • Links to external content, such as the Tacoma Narrows Bridge, are shared humorously, diverging from the main topic.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the ideal work schedule, with multiple competing views and preferences expressed throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the variability of work schedules across different cultures and industries, indicating that the 5-2 structure may not be universally applicable.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to individuals considering different work-life balance models, employers exploring flexible work arrangements, and those curious about cultural differences in work schedules.

ehrenfest
Messages
2,001
Reaction score
1
What do you think of the (almost ubiquitous?) structure of the week: 5 consecutive days of work and then two consecutive days of rest and then repeat? I think it is pretty good for promoting healthy lifestyles.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I like it. I would never want 2 separate days off. It wouldn't allow you to do a small getaway (trip) to anywhere. For those who enjoy camping in the summer, two separate days would ruin the summer.

The only problem I have is with only 2 weeks of paid vacation a year. I have no idea how people settle for that. I'm currently still a student so it's not a problem as of now, but after I'm done school, I am definitely considering moving to France. I met people there and they said you get minimum one month a year paid (sometimes you get a month and a week depending on the month).

Note: Some months occassionally have more business days than others.
 
JasonRox said:
The only problem I have is with only 2 weeks of paid vacation a year. I have no idea how people settle for that.
They move on to better jobs where vacation is a negotiable part of the compensation package.
 
I like it ok, but I think we should have Sunday and Monday off instead of Saturday and Sunday. I hate going to work on Mondays.
 
I would love a nice normal work week like that. :biggrin:
 
I would prefer four 10-hour work days and three off. It would be nice having three days off, plus it would reduce commuting costs.
 
lisab said:
I would prefer four 10-hour work days and three off. It would be nice having three days off, plus it would reduce commuting costs.

Yeah, that would be better. I agree.
 
I worked a 4,3 week for 2 years. A 9.5 hour day is hard on an aging mind & bod.

Routine is good. 5,2 is perfect.
 
DaveC426913 said:
I worked a 4,3 week for 2 years. A 9.5 hour day is hard on an aging mind & bod.

Routine is good. 5,2 is perfect.

The reason Mondays are tough is that you get to sleep in on the weekend and shift your sleep rhythm just enough to make it hard to shift back to getting up early again at the start of every new week. I have a feeling it would be even more difficult starting that first day back to work after 3 day weekends (I already know it is when I have a 3 day weekend due to a Monday or Friday holiday). On the other hand, I wouldn't complain about 3 weeks work and 1 week off.
 
  • #10
10 hours, 4 days a week with a 3 day weekend might be good for me, but it would be terrible for my boss. I get 8 hours work done in a day whether the day lasts 8 hours or 10.
 
  • #12
  • #13
lisab said:
I would prefer four 10-hour work days and three off. It would be nice having three days off, plus it would reduce commuting costs.

I think the state of Utah recently began doing that for a number of its government employees, if only to save on gas.
 
  • #14
BTW, I opened this thread thinking there would be construction involved...
 
  • #15
lisab said:
BTW, I opened this thread thinking there would be construction involved...

:smile: Me too! I was thinking structure as in building, bridge, something like that. Structure of the week like Word of the day.
 
  • #16
When I was considering going to the military the Sergeant that was going to recruit me (boy was he pissed when I ended up declining) told me that when you work on base you usually get 12 hours for 2 days and then 2 days off, rinse, repeat. I don't know how truthful he was being and whether or not that's for all jobs, but I wouldn't be able to do that I don't think. It's 2 days of your life gone vs. still being able to do something with those 4 hours.
 
  • #17
lisab said:
BTW, I opened this thread thinking there would be construction involved...
I was expecting the Eiffel Tower or Taj Majal or Brooklyn Bridge or some similar structure.
 
  • #18
lisab said:
BTW, I opened this thread thinking there would be construction involved...
Me too.
 
  • #19
Astronuc said:
I was expecting the Eiffel Tower or Taj Majal or Brooklyn Bridge or some similar structure.

Or another one of those rotating buildings like the one in Dubai.
 
  • #20
I know people who have 7 12 hour workdays followed by 7 days off.

I definitely prefer 5 days on 2 days off.
 
  • #21
So is it "almost ubiquitous" around the world? If I go to some distance foreign provinceam I likely to find people who think its weird that there is a distinction between the week and the weekend or that follows some weird work-don't work sequence like 1 1 2 3 5 8 13 21... instead of 5 2 5 2 5 2 5 2?
 
  • #22
I was expecting to see people's favorite formal mathematical structure...
 
  • #23
Astronuc said:
I was expecting the Eiffel Tower or Taj Majal or Brooklyn Bridge or some similar structure.

OK, if we are free to abuse this thread, here is my nomination for the structure of the week:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_Narrows_Bridge

(make sure to scroll down to "Galloping Gertie")
 
  • #24
Oberst Villa said:
OK, if we are free to abuse this thread,

Sure go ahead! I love watching threads diverge in new creative directions like this.
 
  • #25
Oberst Villa said:
OK, if we are free to abuse this thread, here is my nomination for the structure of the week:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tacoma_Narrows_Bridge

(make sure to scroll down to "Galloping Gertie")

... What a surprise! I'm about two kilometers away from that bridge at this very moment...
 
  • #26
lisab said:
... What a surprise! I'm about two kilometers away from that bridge at this very moment...

Is it safe yet? Just kidding, the first time I saw this video was a loooong time ago in a college physics class. Are they still showing it?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #27
edward said:
Is it safe yet? Just kidding, the first time I saw this video was a loooong time ago in a college physics class. Are they still showing it?



I'm sure they still show it - it's a classic example of why resonance is such an important consideration for engineers.

The new Tacoma Narrows Bridge is actually two bridges now; the one they built to replace the wrecked one, and a new one that opened last year. People who commute over the bridges tell me their cars get blown around all the time, but at least the bridges are solid :smile: .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #28
edward said:
Is it safe yet? Just kidding, the first time I saw this video was a loooong time ago in a college physics class. Are they still showing it?



I watched that video a rather long time ago in high school physics too.

In college, there was a wooden suspension bridge on campus across a ravine that you could get going quite well if you jumped in the right spot...great for freaking out the art majors (it was really close to the part of campus with the art school). :biggrin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #29
I don't know why it took me so long to think of it, but I remember the first time I heard that the President would give his "State of the Union" speech. I thought it was some kind of contest.
 
  • #30
jimmysnyder said:
I don't know why it took me so long to think of it, but I remember the first time I heard that the President would give his "State of the Union" speech. I thought it was some kind of contest.

:smile: Took me a minute to get that...!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
10K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
86
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K