MHB "structure" on the cosets → normal?

Swlabr1
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Let $H\leq G$, where $G$ is some infinite group, and there exists some $g\in G$ such that the set $\{g^n: n\in\mathbb{Z}\}$ is a transversal for $G/H$. Then is $H$ normal in $G$?

I suspect not. However, I cannot seem to find a counter-example.

(By "a transversal for $G/H$" I mean that

1) $g^nH=g^mH\Rightarrow m=n$

2) if $hH$ is a coset of $G/H$ then there exists some $n\in\mathbb{Z}$ such that $g^nh^{-1}\in H$

so the powers of $g$ form a set of coset representatives for $G/H$, and no two of these representatives lie in the same coset.)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: "structure" on the cosets $\Rightarrow$ normal?

Swlabr said:
Let $H\leq G$, where $G$ is some infinite group, and there exists some $g\in G$ such that the set $\{g^n: n\in\mathbb{Z}\}$ is a transversal for $G/H$. Then is $H$ normal in $G$?

I suspect not. However, I cannot seem to find a counter-example.

(By "a transversal for $G/H$" I mean that

1) $g^nH=g^mH\Rightarrow m=n$

2) if $hH$ is a coset of $G/H$ then there exists some $n\in\mathbb{Z}$ such that $g^nh^{-1}\in H$

so the powers of $g$ form a set of coset representatives for $G/H$, and no two of these representatives lie in the same coset.)

Hi Swlabr, :)

Does \(G/H\) stands for the quotient group ? In that case all the other parts of the question are redundant since by definition of quotient groups \(H\) should be normal in \(G\).

Kind Regards,
Sudharaka.
 
Re: "structure" on the cosets $\Rightarrow$ normal?

What about the (non-normal) subgroup $\mathbb{Z}/2$ as a subgroup of the infinite dihedral group? More precisely, let $G = \langle u,t\ |\ u^2=1,\ utu=t^{-1} \rangle$. Let $H = \{1,u\}$, and take $g=t$ for the generator of the transversal.
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Back
Top