Struggling with Calculating an Integral: Can Someone Help?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dragonblood
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
Click For Summary
The integral in question is \(\int_0^1{\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{x}}dx}\), which was initially approached using a substitution \(u=\sqrt{x}\). The user encountered difficulties with logarithmic expressions when evaluating the integral, particularly at the lower limit. After realizing a mistake, the correct form of the integral was identified as \(\int_0^1{\frac{2u}{1+u}du}\), which simplifies the calculation. A suggestion was made to add and subtract 2 in the numerator for a quicker solution, avoiding issues with logarithmic limits. The discussion highlights the importance of careful substitution and simplification in integral calculus.
dragonblood
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble calculating an integral:

\int_0^1{\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{x}}dx}

I decided to do a substitution:

u=\sqrt{x}
du=\frac{1}{2\sqrt{x}}dx=\frac{1}{2u}dx
thus making the integral look like this:
\int_0^1{\frac{1}{2u}\cdot\frac{1}{1+u}du}
I transformed this integral to:
\int_0^1{\frac{1}{2u}\cdot\frac{1}{1+u}du}=\int_0^1{\frac{A}{2u}+\frac{B}{1+u}du=\int_0^1{\frac{1}{2u}+\frac{(-1/2)}{1+u}du
And tried to solve the integral like this:
\ln|2u|-\frac{1}{2}\ln|1+u|
going from 0 to 1.

However, this means to insert 0 in an ln-expression. Obviously I have done something wrong? Can someone please help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind. I did it now.

It was a simple mistake on my part.

The integral should look like:

\int_0^1{\frac{2u}{1+u}du}

after substitution

and then it should be calculated with integration by parts from there.
 
\left.{\frac{1}{1+\sqrt{x}}\right|_{x=1} = \left\{\frac{1}{2},\infty\right\}
 
I'm not entirely sure what that post means trambolin, care to explain?

Dragonblood - The solution comes out must quicker than integration by parts if you add and subtract 2 into the numerator.
 
I meant the -1 is causing the integrand blow up at x=1 for the cause of ln 0. But nevermind it is just the notation stuff...
 
Ah, yes. That is much easier :) Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K