Stuck I can't find the E field outside cylinder, but inside i found

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the electric field between two concentric cylinders with radii of 3.0 cm and 6.0 cm, carrying charges of 4.9 x 10-6 C/m and -8.5 x 10-6 C/m, respectively. The user successfully calculated the electric field at r = 4.8 cm using the formula E = δ/(2πε0r) but struggled with r = 8.5 cm. The solution involves applying Gauss' Law and summing the charge contributions from both cylinders to find the total charge per unit length. The correct approach is to use the total charge enclosed within the radius when calculating the electric field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss' Law in electrostatics
  • Familiarity with electric field calculations
  • Knowledge of charge per unit length concepts
  • Basic proficiency in physics equations involving electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Gauss' Law in cylindrical symmetry
  • Learn how to calculate electric fields for different charge distributions
  • Explore the concept of electric flux and its relation to charge
  • Review the derivation and application of the formula E = δ/(2πε0r)
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in electrostatics and electric field calculations will benefit from this discussion.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone. I'm so close to getting this problem done but i can't get the last part right!
THe problem is the following:
Two long, charged, thin-walled, concentric cylinders have radii of 3.0 and 6.0 cm. The charge per unit length is 4.9 10- 6 C/m on the inner shell and -8.5 10-6 C/m on the outer shell.

(a) Find the magnitude and direction of the electric field at radial distance r = 4.8 cm from the common central axis. (Take radially outward to be positive.)

I found this by using: E = \delta/2PIEor;
E = (4.9E-6)/(2PIEo(.048m) = 1835826.8 N/C

(b) Find the magnitude and direction of the electric field at r = 8.5 cm, using the same sign convention.

I can't seem to figure this part out. I tr4eid doing the following:
I added up the E field @ 3.0cm and @ 6.0cm to get 389644.9 but didn't know what do it with it from there. So i tried, just using the same method as above in part (a) but insteed of using .048m i used .085m and i got -1798361 N/C which was wrong. Any help would be great!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your knowledge in this field?

It seems very easy to me to just solve this problem by using Gauss' Law. Ever heard of that?

Regards...Cliowa
 
FLux = Q/Eo ? I already tried that and FLux = EA. How would you approach it using Gauss's Law?
 
Solve part b exactly as you solved part a. The only change is that you must use the total charge per unit length contained within the radius. (Add the charge from both cylinders.)
 
the problem I'm having is, how do you figure out the charge, when all your given is the Electrical field? Also am I just finding the charge @ 3cm and the charge @ 6cm, then adding them together, then using that charge in the equation -> E = /2PIEor;
But in that equation there is no charge variable.
 
mr_coffee said:
the problem I'm having is, how do you figure out the charge, when all your given is the Electrical field?
You are given the charge per unit length on each cylinder, not the electric field; the electric field is what you are asked to find.

Also am I just finding the charge @ 3cm and the charge @ 6cm, then adding them together, then using that charge in the equation -> E = /2PIEor;
But in that equation there is no charge variable.
Yes, add the charges. That equation has no charge because you left it out! (Refer to your first post.)
 
Awesome, thanks agan Doc! worked great! :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
854
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K