How Is k Normalized in Schrodinger's Equation?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on normalizing the wave number \( k \) in Schrödinger's equation for a one-dimensional potential distribution. The equation provided is \( k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h} \), and the normalized wave number \( k_{\text{hat}} \) is derived as \( k_{\text{hat}} = \frac{L}{2} \cdot \frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} \cdot \sqrt{[E]} \sqrt{E_{\text{hat}}} \). The term \([E]\) is defined as \([E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}\), which is crucial for arriving at the correct expression for \( k_{\text{hat}} \). The user seeks clarification on the derivation of \([E]\) and the purpose of \( k_{\text{hat}} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Schrödinger's equation, specifically the time-independent form.
  • Familiarity with wave functions and normalization in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanical variables such as energy \( E \), mass \( m \), and Planck's constant \( h \).
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills for rearranging equations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the term \([E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}\) in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the normalization of wave functions in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of normalized wave numbers in quantum systems.
  • Explore the physical significance of \( k_{\text{hat}} \) in relation to potential distributions.
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, particularly those tackling Schrödinger's equation, as well as educators and researchers looking to clarify concepts of normalization and energy expressions in quantum systems.

bumclouds
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Hey guys,

Homework Statement


I have an assignment, which is to Solve Schrödinger's equations, for a certain potential distribution, which can be divided up into three regions.

A solution for one of the regions is of the form: Ae^{kx}



If you substitute this into Schrödinger's equation (time independent, one dimension) and solve for k, you get this:

Schrodingers:
\frac{-h}{2m} \frac{d^{2}}{dx^{2}} \Psi (x) + Vo \Psi (x) = E \Psi (x)

Solve for k:
k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h}

I know this part is right because I've seen it written on the board a couple of times, and it's also what I get on paper.

But then there's the next bit, which I don't get. Apparently it's 'normalising k' which I just don't get..

k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h}

k\overline{^}\overline{} = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h}.\frac{L}{2}

[E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}

k_hat = \frac{L}{2} . \frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} . \sqrt{E}

k_hat = \frac{L}{2} . \frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} . \sqrt{\frac{E[E]}{[E]}}

k_hat = \frac{L}{2} . \frac{\sqrt{2m}}{h} . \sqrt{[E]} \sqrt{Ehat}

k_hat = \frac{\pi}{2} \sqrt{Ehat}

Homework Equations



None.


The Attempt at a Solution



If I rearrange k = \frac{\sqrt{2mE}}{h} and make E the subject,

I get ..

E = \frac{h^{2}khat^{2}}{2m}

and maybe this is where I go wrong.. because I assume E = [E] ?

Subtituting [E] into the second last step in section 2 above yields:

khat = \frac{L}{2} khat \sqrt{Ehat}

and that doesn't equal the last step >_<

EDIT: ahh.. if I use their definition of [E], [E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}
I arrive at the right answer..


so how did they come up with [E] = \frac{\pi^{2}h^{2}}{2ML^{2}}??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What is k_hat and what are you trying to achieve, an expression for E?
 
Sorry! I've edited my above post.. Now it makes more sense :)

What I'm really after is how did they (my teacher) come up with [E] and what is it?


k_hat is apparently a normalised k
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
840
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K