Stuck on (proving) a linear charge problem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
FlyingButtress
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Question:[/B]
FmUcWz3.png


____________________________________________________________________________________

And the answer in the solution manual:
cbl0WP6.png

Homework Equations


Trig sub? [tex]a^2/x^2 = tan(θ)[/tex]
I'm thinking x>>a would affect this majorly and I'm not seeing how.

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand the concept behind this (I think), but part c is killing me right now. I have no idea how the inverse square root turns into the final equation. Maybe I should have posted this in Calculus, but I have no recollection of learning this in calc I/II, nor physics I/II so I didn't know where to post.

The [tex]a^2/x^2[/tex] looks eerily similar to a trig sub problem, but I don't see how that would work because there's no integral.

For [tex]E_x,[/tex] I was able to set the limit of a to 0 to get the point charge equation. The solution manual didn't do it this way but it worked for me to get the point charge equation.

BTW I already have a) and b), which were pretty straightforward.
Could someone point me in the right direction please? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
FlyingButtress said:

Homework Equations


Trig sub? [tex]a^2/x^2 = tan(θ)[/tex]
You should double-check that with the definition of the tangent.

3. The Attempt at a Solution
I understand the concept behind this (I think), but part c is killing me right now. I have no idea how the inverse square root turns into the final equation. Maybe I should have posted this in Calculus, but I have no recollection of learning this in calc I/II, nor physics I/II so I didn't know where to post.

The [tex]a^2/x^2[/tex] looks eerily similar to a trig sub problem, but I don't see how that would work because there's no integral.

For [tex]E_x,[/tex] I was able to set the limit of a to 0 to get the point charge equation. The solution manual didn't do it this way but it worked for me to get the point charge equation.

BTW I already have a) and b), which were pretty straightforward.
Could someone point me in the right direction please? Thank you!
Assuming you have the first two parts, you might want to take a look at the Taylor expansion of those answers.
 
How do you come to the conclusion that your equation is relevant for the problem? You should rather think about the question, how to calculate the force between two point charges and then how you can generalize this to many point charges and finally to a continuous charge distribution!
 
tms said:
You should double-check that with the definition of the tangent.Assuming you have the first two parts, you might want to take a look at the Taylor expansion of those answers.

Ah, okay. The format change to (1+x)^(n) is making more sense now... I'm very rusty on infinite series so I'll have to take some time to review. From a brief look at my calc book it looks like it matches the binomial series. Will spend more time to see if it is right. Thanks!

vanhees71 said:
How do you come to the conclusion that your equation is relevant for the problem? You should rather think about the question, how to calculate the force between two point charges and then how you can generalize this to many point charges and finally to a continuous charge distribution!

They just looked similar, like [tex]y^2/x^2[/tex]
No other reason.
I actually did use that for part a, solving for [tex]E_x[/tex], but I've already solved parts a and b :) Sorry if I wasn't clear.