MHB Stuck on the sides of a triangle problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter tony700
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Stuck Triangle
tony700
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I have figured out the triangle's height and base, but I need to figure out sides a and b. I have tried Pythagorean theorem and similar triangle ratios, but it is not working out. Please help. See picture below. Thank you.View attachment 6489
 

Attachments

  • problem2.jpg
    problem2.jpg
    11.5 KB · Views: 76
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We have that two right triangles and from the Pythagorean Theorem for those two we get:
$$464^2+e^2=a^2$$ and $$464^2+(1218-e)^2=b^2$$

From the Geometric mean theorem we have that $$464^2=e\cdot (1218-e)$$

Now we have three unknown variables, $a,b,e$, and three equations. So, we can find the values for $a,b,e$.
 
Is the angle contained by $a$ and $b$ equal to $90^\circ$? For that matter, what is the complete problem?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
59
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top