Stuck with a simple induction problem

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter leden
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Stuck
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving by induction that in a sequence of 0s and 1s, starting with 1 and prohibiting consecutive 0s, the number of 0s is never greater than the number of 1s. The user attempted various forms of induction and found that strong induction is effective. The proof involves analyzing the structure of the sequence, particularly that any string with more 0s than 1s must be at least length 3 and cannot end with two 0s, leading to a contradiction.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction, particularly strong induction.
  • Familiarity with sequences and combinatorial structures.
  • Basic knowledge of binary sequences and their properties.
  • Experience with proof techniques in discrete mathematics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of strong induction in detail.
  • Explore combinatorial proofs related to binary sequences.
  • Learn about the properties of sequences in discrete mathematics.
  • Practice constructing proofs for similar induction problems.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in discrete mathematics and proof techniques, particularly those focusing on induction and combinatorial reasoning.

leden
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Suppose you are building a sequence consisting of 0 and 1 in such a way that:
- you start with 1
- no consecutive 0s are allowed
Examples of such sequences are: 1, 1010, 110111101 etc. Empty sequence is also allowed.

I want to prove by induction that the number of 0s in such a sequence is never greater than the number of 1s.

(Btw, I managed to prove that the length of such a sequence is at least the number of 1s inside, but I am not sure that the proof for this is any similar to this one.)

I tried almost every form of induction I could think of (except nested induction), but simply couldn't prove it. Please help.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try strong induction and break the string of length k into fragments.
 
If a string with more 0's then 1's is possible, there has to be a smallest string.
It must have a length at least 3, because 1, 10 and 11 are the only possible smaller strings, and they don't have more 0's then ones

This string can't have the form x1, because x would also have more 0s then 1s, so it must end in a 0.

The string can't end with 2 zero's because no consecutive 0's are allowed, so the string must have the form x10. If x10 has more zero's then ones, then so has x, which isn't possible, because x was the smallest string with more zeros then ones.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 55 ·
2
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K