Study Physics: Self-Studying Tips for B.S. in ME & PhD in Nanotech

  • Context: Studying 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Rios
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics Self-studying
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around self-studying advanced physics, particularly for someone with a background in mechanical engineering and current studies in nanotechnology. Participants share resources, study strategies, and address challenges related to understanding complex physics concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to learn advanced physics and plans to follow a physics major's academic program, starting with lower division course books.
  • Another participant recommends starting with Landau's Mechanics, suggesting it could provide a strong foundation if the reader is willing to explore the underlying mathematics.
  • There is a discussion about the necessity of reviewing calculus before tackling advanced physics texts, with some participants emphasizing the importance of a solid mathematical background.
  • Concerns are raised about the feasibility of self-studying advanced material with limited daily study time, with one participant calculating that it could take decades to complete a physics degree at such a pace.
  • Participants debate whether to read Boas in order or to start with specific chapters based on the reader's background and comfort level with mathematics.
  • One participant shares their struggles with understanding specific chapters in Analytical Mechanics and Electrodynamics, questioning their ability to grasp advanced material given their limited study time.
  • Another participant stresses that studying physics requires a different approach than casual reading, suggesting that intensive study is necessary to succeed in complex subjects like Electrodynamics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to studying advanced physics, with differing opinions on the necessity of reviewing foundational material, the order of reading specific texts, and the feasibility of self-study given time constraints.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of a strong mathematical foundation for understanding advanced physics, while others express uncertainty about their readiness to tackle complex topics without further review. The discussion reflects varying levels of confidence and preparedness among participants.

Fernando Rios
Messages
96
Reaction score
10
I have a B.S. in Mechanical Enginerring and I am almost done with a PhD in Nanotechnology. Through these years I realized I really like physics and I would like to learn mmore advanced physics than the one I know so far. I would like to know how to study physics. My plan is to follow the academic program for a physics major and read all the books they read. I just started by reading the lower division courses books. Does anybody has any suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First start with Landau - Mechanics. See how you feel - the reviews say it all:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0750628960/?tag=pfamazon01-20

If it still appeals, and it converted me from math to physics, then get back for further suggestions depending on the direction you are interested in. For example you may want to know why Classical Mechanics as formulated in advanced books like Landau. The answer is QM - but you need to discover that yourself - we can guide you but only you can do it.

Thanks
Bill
 
Bill,

I started reading a Calculus book to review the lower division material. Should I continue with the lower division stuff, or should I move on to Mechanics by Landau?
 
To understand Landau you need Calculus 3 in the US system. I do not know if that is what you mean by'Lower Division'. I would not normally recommend this but since you have, or soon will have, a PhD in a science area it should not really be a problem.

If you are serious about Physics you need to know the background math. The best book I know for that is Boas:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471198269/?tag=pfamazon01-20

You need Chapter 9 on the calculus of variations for Landau. So get that and study both books together. If you decide physics is for you Boas is a very valuable reference and a good book to study before delving further into more advanced physics.

The beauty of Boas is you do not need much calculus to understand it. If you feel the need for a refresher the following, actually written by physicists (one a Nobel winner) is good:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0471827223/?tag=pfamazon01-20

You can do it in a weekend.

Later you probably will want to delve into the proofs and aspects of pure math associated with this stuff. Its not essential, and best left until you are well on your way in your journey of more advanced physics, but I have found the following, in this order good:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0691125333/?tag=pfamazon01-20
http://matrixeditions.com/5thUnifiedApproach.html
But do not worry about that for now - Boas is all you need to start. It's just a suggestion for later because I love analysis :DD:DD:DD:DD:DD:DD:DD:DD:DD

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited:
Hi Bill,

Thanks for your response and sorry for too many questions. Should I read Boas book in the order it is given by the author or should I follow a different order, like start in Chapter 9?
 
Fernando Rios said:
Bill,

I started reading a Calculus book to review the lower division material. Should I continue with the lower division stuff, or should I move on to Mechanics by Landau?

Shouldn’t you already calculus and a lot of other mathematics if you are about to graduate in mechanical engineering?

Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
Shouldn’t you already calculus and a lot of other mathematics if you are about to graduate in mechanical engineering?

Zz.
Yes, you are right, but I wanted to know if it was necessary to review the material, since I haven't seen it for a while.
 
Fernando Rios said:
Yes, you are right, but I wanted to know if it was necessary to review the material, since I haven't seen it for a while.
OBVIOUSLY you must review the material. Nobody is likely to keep all the skills and concepts in high quality condition. One must review as often as necessary to keep in shape.
 
Fernando Rios said:
Thanks for your response and sorry for too many questions. Should I read Boas book in the order it is given by the author or should I follow a different order, like start in Chapter 9?

In your case given your background, start with Boaz Chapter 9. If its too much at this stage start reading Boas from the beginning, but since you already have a degree in ME you should probably be alright. Then read Landau. Beware of Landau though - it's not actually hard - its one of those books that you keep rereading and get more with each read - its deep - just like the reviews said.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #10
Hi Bill. I just feel kind of weak in math, so I started reading Boas from the beginning and I am almost done with the first chapter. Do you think it is okey if I start reading Landau once I am done with Boas?

Thanks
Fernando
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bhobba
  • #11
100% for sure. Landau Mechanics is just do beautiful (but terse) it will change your view of physics. But take it oslowly, its not a race.

Thanks
Bill
 
  • #12
Hi Bill. I forgot to tell you that someone suggested me to start reading Analytical Mechanics (written by Fowles). I read it, but I didn't understand the last two chapters (Lagrangian Mechanics and Dynamics of Oscillating Systems), I guess the problem was calculus of variations. Then I tried to read Introduction to Electrodynamics (written by Griffiths), but I didn't understand it. Based on this and the fact that I only spend at most one hour everyday for reagins these books, do you think I can understand advanced material? Or not? If I can, should I still consider reading Boas and then Landau?
 
  • #13
Fernando Rios said:
My plan is to follow the academic program for a physics major and read all the books they read.
Fernando Rios said:
but I didn't understand the last two chapters
Fernando Rios said:
ased on this and the fact that I only spend at most one hour everyday

I don't think you are being realistic. A BS in physics is 4 years at 40 weeks per year and 50 hours per week. That's 8000 hours. Maybe you need less because of what you've already learned, and maybe you need more because you are doing this on your own, but let's go with 8000 hours. Let's say "at most one hour everyday" means 5 hours a week.

So it's 31 years to finish.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and Bystander
  • #14
bhobba said:
100% for sure. Landau Mechanics is just do beautiful (but terse) it will change your view of physics. But take it oslowly, its not a race.

Thanks
Bill
Hi Bill. I forgot to tell you that someone suggested me to start reading Analytical Mechanics (written by Fowles). I read it, but I didn't understand the last two chapters (Lagrangian Mechanics and Dynamics of Oscillating Systems), I guess the problem was calculus of variations. Then I tried to read Introduction to Electrodynamics (written by Griffiths), but I didn't understand it. Based on this and the fact that I only spend at most one hour everyday for reading these books, do you think I can understand advanced material? Or not? If I can, should I still consider reading Boas and then Landau?

Thanks
Fernando
 
  • #15
Fernando Rios said:
Hi Bill. I forgot to tell you that someone suggested me to start reading Analytical Mechanics (written by Fowles). I read it, but I didn't understand the last two chapters (Lagrangian Mechanics and Dynamics of Oscillating Systems), I guess the problem was calculus of variations. Then I tried to read Introduction to Electrodynamics (written by Griffiths), but I didn't understand it. Based on this and the fact that I only spend at most one hour everyday for reading these books, do you think I can understand advanced material? Or not? If I can, should I still consider reading Boas and then Landau?

Thanks
Fernando

You don't read a Physics textbook, you study from it. It sounds like you are trying to read this stuff like you would a detective novel.

Griffiths Electrodynamics must take about 500 hours, at least. But that assumes periods of intensive study and a certain amount of the mathematical prerequisites.

At one hour a day, you cannot progress to advanced material. Students at university will be studying 50 hours a week and they still find things like Electrodynamics hard and that there is not enough time in the week.

It would take at least as long to get through Boas or Landau.
 
  • #16
Fernando Rios said:
Then I tried to read Introduction to Electrodynamics (written by Griffiths), but I didn't understand it.
That suggests to me that you should get one of the standard first-year calculus based intro physics books (e.g. Halliday/Resnick/Walker) and study the chapters on electromagnetism, then return to Griffiths.

As an engineer, you probably took a first-year physics course that included electromagnetism, but as a mechanical engineer you've probably used little or no electromagnetism in later courses or in your work. You've probably forgotten most of it and need to start from scratch.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K