SO(3) group, Heisenberg Hamiltonian

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22
We have commutation relation ##[J_j,J_k]=i \epsilon_{jkl}J_l## satisfied for ##2x2##, ##3x3##, ##4x4## matrices. Are in all dimensions these matrices generate ##SO(3)## group? I am confused because I think that maybe for ##4x4## matrices they will generate ##SO(4)## group. For instance for Heisenberg Hamiltonian
[tex]H=-\frac{J}{2}\sum_{n,m}\vec{S}_n \cdot \vec{S}_m[/tex] depending on spin of the sistem is this Hamiltonian always ##SO(3)## invariant or no? Or it is SO(n) symmetry in general?
 
on Phys.org
They together close to form the Lie algebra of the SO(3) group. But SO(3) (and so(3) the Lie algebra) can have various dimensional representations. So yes, it depends on the "spin of the system" which is another way of specifying which irreducible representation of SO(3) (or rather its corresponding spin group) you're considering.

Note: The dimension of the group is number of independent parameters which equates to the number of (linearly) independent generators. Hence here the general group element is: ##G(\Theta) =\exp( i\theta^k J_k)##. The group here is 3 dimensional... but which 3-dim group? That's what the commutator relations determine. Then what dimensional matrices these generators are describes the dimension of the representation.

[Edit] Let me add, for SO(n) the n is the dimension of the fundamental representation, namely the spin 1 or vector representation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: LagrangeEuler

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K