I have been reading Georgi "Lie Algebras in Particle Physics" and on page 183 he mentions how that the SU(3) defining representation decomposes into an SU(2) doublet with hyperchage (1/3) and singlet with hypercharge (-2/3). I am confused on how he knows this. I apologize if this is not the right place to put such a question.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# SU(3) defining representation (3) decomposition under SU(2) x U(1) subgroup.

Loading...

Similar Threads - defining representation decomposition | Date |
---|---|

I Bases for SU(3) Adjoint representation | Aug 13, 2016 |

What defines the kind of decay an isotope would go for? | Feb 1, 2014 |

Is the electric charge of bosons w1 w2 w3 well defined? | Sep 24, 2011 |

Are effective field theories mathematically well-defined? | Apr 7, 2010 |

Is chirality operator defined in odd dimensions? | Jul 31, 2008 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**