Prove: X Contains at Most n(n-1)/2 Elements in Subset of a Group

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter the_fox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Group
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the set X, defined as X={(a,b) | a in A, b in A, ab in A}, contains at most n(n-1)/2 elements, where A is a subset of a group G with n elements. It is established that if x is in A, then its inverse x^(-1) is not in A, leading to two scenarios: one where A includes the identity element and one where it does not. The proof hinges on the properties of groups, specifically closure, associativity, identity, and inverses, demonstrating that the maximum size of X is achieved when considering the absence of self-inverses.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically the properties of groups.
  • Familiarity with subsets and their characteristics within group structures.
  • Knowledge of binary operations and their implications in group contexts.
  • Concept of self-inverses and their effect on set membership.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of groups in detail, focusing on closure and associativity.
  • Explore the concept of identity elements in groups and their implications for subsets.
  • Investigate the role of inverses in group theory and how they affect subset formation.
  • Learn about combinatorial proofs in group theory to enhance understanding of set sizes.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in group theory and combinatorial proofs will benefit from this discussion.

the_fox
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Let G be a group and A a subset of G with n elements such that if x is in A then x^(-1) is not in A. Let X={(a,b) a in A, b in A, ab in A}. Prove that X contains at most n(n-1)/2 elements.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hint: X is largest when a,b in A => ab in A.
 
That's how X is defined. What exactly do you mean?
 
Let's see what we are given. We have G as a group and A as a subset of G. Thus, since G is a group, we have the following giveaways:

1) G is closed under the binary operation
2) G is associative under the binary operation
3) G has an identity element
4) G has an inverse for each element

A is a subset of G with n elements, such that each element has it's inverse NOT contained in the set.

Since A is just a subset of G, we cannot assume that it will have an identity (this is only a giveaway if it were a subgroup). Thus, we will have some sort of a max here, meaning, there is a version of A that has the identity, and a version without the identity.

This matters because the inverse of an identity is itself. Thus if we have A with an identity, we'd have to remove it completely from the set since a = a^-1 and a^-1 is not permitted in A. This gives us (n-1) elements.

Now, what happens when A does NOT have the identity? This means you have n elements since each a in A is not a self-inverse.

Thus you have to account for a set that factors in self-inverses, and a set that doesn't. Getting the number of non-inverses just amounts to taking half of the given number of elements of the particular set (since we know through G that each element of A does have an inverse).

Try applying this to X.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
983
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
657
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
654
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K