Successive Measurements of angular momentum

In summary, Bill_K and Ski determined that the angular momentum of a particle in a j=1 state is i√2, -i√2 and 0, and that the probability of finding each value is the overlap of the corresponding eigenvectors.
  • #1
Sekonda
207
0
Hello,

I believe this to be a rather simple problem but I am not quite sure if my thinking is correct.

We have a particle in a j=1 state of angular momentum J. I am first asked to find some eigenvectors of the matrix J(y):

[tex]J_{y}=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}i}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 & 0\\ 1 & 0 & -1\\ 0 & -1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Is this correct?

I got the eigenvalues of this matrix to be i√2, -i√2 and 0 which I believe correspond, respectively to,
[tex]\hbar, -\hbar, 0[/tex]

Though my main question (provided the above is correct) is that we are told the system is in a state of the J(y) corresponding to the positive non-zero eigenvector, we are then asked to find the probability of finding each value :
[tex]\hbar, -\hbar, 0[/tex]
of the J(z) angular momentum.

Surely this is just given by the normalized coefficients of the eigenvectors of J(z) and the fact it is in a state of J(y) is not relevant?

I can post the eigenvectors I attained for the J(y) matrix if required.

Thanks,
SK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I found the eigenvectors of J(y), shown above, to be:

[tex]\begin{pmatrix} 1\\ \sqrt{2}i\\ -1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ -\sqrt{2}i\\ -1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \sqrt{2}\\ 0\\ \sqrt{2} \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Normalized by a factor 0.5 in front of each of them, these eigenvectors have the eigenvalues: i√2, -i√2 and 0 respectively, I believe that they can be manipulated into h-bar, negative h-bar and zero.
 
  • #3
we are told the system is in a state of the J(y) corresponding to the positive non-zero eigenvector, we are then asked to find the probability of finding each value of the J(z) angular momentum. Surely this is just given by the normalized coefficients of the eigenvectors of J(z) and the fact it is in a state of J(y) is not relevant?
The probability amplitude of finding each value of Jz in an eigenstate of Jy is the overlap, <Jz= mz|Jy= my>, and the probability itself is that thing squared, |<|>|2.
 
  • #4
First off, I think you meant for the bottom middle entry of the matrix to be a positive one, no? Otherwise, that Jy just has eigenvalues of zero.

I would think you take the eigenvector corresponding to the [itex]J_y = \hbar[/itex] measurement, which corresponds to your state, [itex]\psi[/itex]. Then, you know the eigenvalues of the Jz matrix,
[itex]J_z = \hbar \begin{pmatrix}
1 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & 0\\
0 & 0 & -1
\end{pmatrix}[/itex]

has eigenvalues [itex] -\hbar, 0, \hbar[/itex]

find the eigenvectors corresponding to each of those values, then to find the probabilities, you do

[itex]P_\lambda = |\langle \psi_z \mid \psi_y \rangle|^2[/itex]

where [itex]P_\lambda[/itex] is the probability of a measurement of eigenvalue λ for Jz, [itex]\psi_z[/itex] is the eigenvector for that eigenvalue of Jz, and [itex]\psi_y[/itex] is the eigenvector corresponding to the [itex]\hbar[/itex] eigenvalue for Jy.

You may want a second opinion, because Angular Momentum was not my strongest subject in QM, but this seems right. Remember to normalize all eigenvectors!
 
  • #5
Thanks Bill_K and soothslayer, I was getting confused and I also thought that particular eigenvector component should of been a different sign.

This now makes sense, I'll try and apply it and come back soon if I'm having trouble.

Thanks guys!
 
  • #6
Hey I'm back,

I think I have done this question now, does the following seem correct. Right so I determined the Jy angular momentum matrix with the following normalized eigenvectors and corresponding eigenvalues:

[tex]J_{y}=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}i}\begin{pmatrix} 0 &1 & 0\\ -1 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & -1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\; ,\; \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}i} : \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 1\\ \sqrt2i\\ -1 \end{pmatrix}\; ,\; -\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}i}: \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 1\\ -\sqrt2i\\ -1 \end{pmatrix}\; ,\; 0: \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} \sqrt2\\ 0\\ \sqrt2 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Though I'm not sure if this labelling of eigenvalues is correct! I don't know if I can just list them as +hbar, -hbar and 0.

Anyway, the eigenvectors and corresponding eigenvalues of the Jz matrix are:

[tex]\hbar: \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 0\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\; ,\; -\hbar:\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 0\\ 1 \end{pmatrix}\; ,\; 0:\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 1\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Using the +ve eigenstate of Jy I found the following probabilities of attaining states +hbar and -hbar of Jz as 0.25 each and 0.5 for the 0 state of Jz, they sum to 1 so I'm guessing I've done it right?

Is it?

Thanks,
SK
 
  • #7
Yeah, you got it!
 
  • #8
Ahh good, thanks. I think the eigenvalues for the Jy matrix can be simplified to hbar, -hbar and 0.
 
  • #9
Yes, they can. You actually can't have imaginary numbers as eigenvalues in quantum mechanics, for the most part. Most operators in QM are Hermitian, because the eigenvalues must correspond to observables, which must be real. Not ALL the time, but certainly for something that should be observable, like angular momentum.
 
  • #10
Ahh yes of course, I forgot about the whole operators are observables and the fact that the eigenvalue is the measured result etc. Thanks again soothslayer for your help, much appreciated!

SK
 

1. What is angular momentum?

Angular momentum is a physical quantity that measures the rotational motion of an object around a fixed axis. It is a vector quantity, meaning it has both magnitude and direction. In simpler terms, it is the measure of how much an object is spinning.

2. How is angular momentum measured?

Angular momentum is measured by multiplying the moment of inertia (a measure of an object's resistance to rotational motion) by the angular velocity (the rate at which an object is rotating). The formula for angular momentum is L = Iω, where L is angular momentum, I is moment of inertia, and ω is angular velocity.

3. What is the principle of conservation of angular momentum?

The principle of conservation of angular momentum states that the total angular momentum of a closed system (a system with no external forces acting on it) remains constant over time. This means that if one part of the system increases its angular momentum, another part must decrease its angular momentum by the same amount to maintain the overall balance.

4. How does successive measurement affect angular momentum?

Successive measurement of angular momentum can affect its value depending on the measurement technique and the system being measured. In some cases, the act of measuring angular momentum can change its value due to the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. However, in classical mechanics, successive measurements should not significantly affect the value of angular momentum.

5. Why is the measurement of angular momentum important in physics?

The measurement of angular momentum is important in physics because it is a fundamental quantity that describes the rotational motion of objects. It is used to understand and predict the behavior of objects in motion, such as planets orbiting around a star or a spinning top. It also plays a crucial role in the conservation laws of physics, helping to explain the behavior of systems and the universe as a whole.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
401
Replies
32
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
867
Replies
8
Views
765
  • Quantum Physics
2
Replies
56
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
875
Replies
2
Views
574
Replies
28
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top