Successive Measurements of angular momentum

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of eigenvalues and eigenvectors for angular momentum matrices in quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the J(y) and J(z) operators. Participants explore the implications of these calculations for determining the probabilities of measuring specific angular momentum values.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the correctness of their eigenvalue calculations for the J(y) matrix and proposes that the eigenvalues correspond to h-bar, -h-bar, and 0.
  • Another participant provides their own eigenvector calculations for J(y) and suggests that these can be normalized to match the proposed eigenvalues.
  • There is a discussion about the relevance of the J(y) state when calculating probabilities for J(z), with one participant asserting that the normalized coefficients of J(z) eigenvectors should suffice.
  • One participant suggests that the eigenvector corresponding to the J(y) measurement should be used to find the probabilities for J(z), detailing the mathematical approach to calculate these probabilities.
  • Another participant expresses uncertainty about the labeling of eigenvalues and whether they can simply be listed as +h-bar, -h-bar, and 0.
  • There is a clarification that eigenvalues in quantum mechanics must be real, leading to a consensus that the eigenvalues for the J(y) matrix can indeed be simplified to h-bar, -h-bar, and 0.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

While there is some agreement on the simplification of eigenvalues to real numbers, the discussion contains multiple viewpoints on the relevance of the J(y) state for calculating probabilities related to J(z). Participants express uncertainty and seek clarification on various aspects of the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential confusion regarding the normalization of eigenvectors and the implications of imaginary eigenvalues in quantum mechanics. There is also mention of the need for normalization in calculations, which remains a point of emphasis throughout the discussion.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and practitioners of quantum mechanics, particularly those interested in angular momentum and operator theory.

Sekonda
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I believe this to be a rather simple problem but I am not quite sure if my thinking is correct.

We have a particle in a j=1 state of angular momentum J. I am first asked to find some eigenvectors of the matrix J(y):

[tex]J_{y}=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}i}\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 & 0\\ 1 & 0 & -1\\ 0 & -1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Is this correct?

I got the eigenvalues of this matrix to be i√2, -i√2 and 0 which I believe correspond, respectively to,
[tex]\hbar, -\hbar, 0[/tex]

Though my main question (provided the above is correct) is that we are told the system is in a state of the J(y) corresponding to the positive non-zero eigenvector, we are then asked to find the probability of finding each value :
[tex]\hbar, -\hbar, 0[/tex]
of the J(z) angular momentum.

Surely this is just given by the normalized coefficients of the eigenvectors of J(z) and the fact it is in a state of J(y) is not relevant?

I can post the eigenvectors I attained for the J(y) matrix if required.

Thanks,
SK
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I found the eigenvectors of J(y), shown above, to be:

[tex]\begin{pmatrix} 1\\ \sqrt{2}i\\ -1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ -\sqrt{2}i\\ -1 \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} \sqrt{2}\\ 0\\ \sqrt{2} \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Normalized by a factor 0.5 in front of each of them, these eigenvectors have the eigenvalues: i√2, -i√2 and 0 respectively, I believe that they can be manipulated into h-bar, negative h-bar and zero.
 
we are told the system is in a state of the J(y) corresponding to the positive non-zero eigenvector, we are then asked to find the probability of finding each value of the J(z) angular momentum. Surely this is just given by the normalized coefficients of the eigenvectors of J(z) and the fact it is in a state of J(y) is not relevant?
The probability amplitude of finding each value of Jz in an eigenstate of Jy is the overlap, <Jz= mz|Jy= my>, and the probability itself is that thing squared, |<|>|2.
 
First off, I think you meant for the bottom middle entry of the matrix to be a positive one, no? Otherwise, that Jy just has eigenvalues of zero.

I would think you take the eigenvector corresponding to the [itex]J_y = \hbar[/itex] measurement, which corresponds to your state, [itex]\psi[/itex]. Then, you know the eigenvalues of the Jz matrix,
[itex]J_z = \hbar \begin{pmatrix}<br /> 1 & 0 & 0\\ <br /> 0 & 0 & 0\\ <br /> 0 & 0 & -1<br /> \end{pmatrix}[/itex]

has eigenvalues [itex]-\hbar, 0, \hbar[/itex]

find the eigenvectors corresponding to each of those values, then to find the probabilities, you do

[itex]P_\lambda = |\langle \psi_z \mid \psi_y \rangle|^2[/itex]

where [itex]P_\lambda[/itex] is the probability of a measurement of eigenvalue λ for Jz, [itex]\psi_z[/itex] is the eigenvector for that eigenvalue of Jz, and [itex]\psi_y[/itex] is the eigenvector corresponding to the [itex]\hbar[/itex] eigenvalue for Jy.

You may want a second opinion, because Angular Momentum was not my strongest subject in QM, but this seems right. Remember to normalize all eigenvectors!
 
Thanks Bill_K and soothslayer, I was getting confused and I also thought that particular eigenvector component should of been a different sign.

This now makes sense, I'll try and apply it and come back soon if I'm having trouble.

Thanks guys!
 
Hey I'm back,

I think I have done this question now, does the following seem correct. Right so I determined the Jy angular momentum matrix with the following normalized eigenvectors and corresponding eigenvalues:

[tex]J_{y}=\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}i}\begin{pmatrix} 0 &1 & 0\\ -1 & 0 & 1\\ 0 & -1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\; ,\; \frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}i} : \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 1\\ \sqrt2i\\ -1 \end{pmatrix}\; ,\; -\frac{\hbar}{\sqrt{2}i}: \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} 1\\ -\sqrt2i\\ -1 \end{pmatrix}\; ,\; 0: \frac{1}{2}\begin{pmatrix} \sqrt2\\ 0\\ \sqrt2 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Though I'm not sure if this labelling of eigenvalues is correct! I don't know if I can just list them as +hbar, -hbar and 0.

Anyway, the eigenvectors and corresponding eigenvalues of the Jz matrix are:

[tex]\hbar: \begin{pmatrix} 1\\ 0\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}\; ,\; -\hbar:\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 0\\ 1 \end{pmatrix}\; ,\; 0:\begin{pmatrix} 0\\ 1\\ 0 \end{pmatrix}[/tex]

Using the +ve eigenstate of Jy I found the following probabilities of attaining states +hbar and -hbar of Jz as 0.25 each and 0.5 for the 0 state of Jz, they sum to 1 so I'm guessing I've done it right?

Is it?

Thanks,
SK
 
Yeah, you got it!
 
Ahh good, thanks. I think the eigenvalues for the Jy matrix can be simplified to hbar, -hbar and 0.
 
Yes, they can. You actually can't have imaginary numbers as eigenvalues in quantum mechanics, for the most part. Most operators in QM are Hermitian, because the eigenvalues must correspond to observables, which must be real. Not ALL the time, but certainly for something that should be observable, like angular momentum.
 
  • #10
Ahh yes of course, I forgot about the whole operators are observables and the fact that the eigenvalue is the measured result etc. Thanks again soothslayer for your help, much appreciated!

SK
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K