Clarification on a statement about spin 1/2 z component related to x and y

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a statement made in a YouTube lecture regarding the relationship between spin states in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the transition from states with definite z-angular momentum to those with definite x-angular momentum. Participants are exploring concepts related to spin, superposition, and the mathematical representation of these states as presented in Griffiths' textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the statement made in the lecture about combining states with definite z-angular momentum to achieve a state of definite x-angular momentum, noting that the preceding material focused solely on x and y without reference to z.
  • Another participant clarifies that the states discussed, ##\chi_+## and ##\chi_-##, are eigenstates of the ##S_x## operator and are expressed in the z-basis, which is a common convention in quantum mechanics.
  • Several participants express confusion about the term "z-basis" and seek clarification on its significance and whether it is a given concept in the context of the discussion.
  • There is a discussion about the conventional use of the z-basis in quantum mechanics, with some participants emphasizing that it is standard to use ##S_z## and ##S^2## as the default observables for spin.
  • Some participants express frustration with the Griffiths textbook, particularly regarding the lack of clarity on the concept of superposition, which they feel is inadequately explained.
  • One participant attempts to break down the statement in question into parts, seeking to understand the implications of combining states with definite z-angular momentum and how this relates to the resulting state of definite x-angular momentum.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the definitions of the states and the use of the z-basis, but there remains uncertainty and confusion about the implications of the statement regarding z and x angular momentum. The discussion reflects multiple competing views and interpretations of the concepts involved.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note limitations in their understanding of superposition and its treatment in Griffiths' textbook, suggesting that the material may not adequately cover the concept for self-study learners.

  • #31
PeterDonis said:
Actually, I take that back; you didn't do it entirely correctly in post #22, you just got lucky.

The correct part of what you did in post #22 is this equation:

$$
\frac{\hbar}{2} \begin{bmatrix} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & 0 \end{bmatrix} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix} = \lambda \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ 1 \end{bmatrix}
$$

where I have put back the factors of ##1 / \sqrt{2}## on each side to make it clear exactly what we are doing, namely, writing the eigenvalue equation for ##\hat{S}_x## and ##| x_+ \rangle##. But this gives two equations for ##\lambda##, not one: one equation for the upper component of the RHS, the second for the lower component of the RHS. Those equations are

$$
\frac{\hbar}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( 0 \times 1 + 1 \times 1 \right) = \lambda \times \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \times 1
$$

$$
\frac{\hbar}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \left( 1 \times 1 + 0 \times 1 \right) = \lambda \times \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \times 1
$$

Both of these equations give the same value for ##\lambda##, namely ##\hbar / 2##.

Now do the same with the column vector

$$
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{bmatrix}
$$
shoot, (wasn't being careful) , should have looked up the actual matrix operation -

$$
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix}
0&\frac{\hbar}{2}\\ \frac{\hbar}{2}&0\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix}
1\\-1\end{pmatrix} = \lambda \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{bmatrix}
$$
2 equations:
$$
\frac{\hbar}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} \\
-\frac{\hbar}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = -\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} \\

\lambda = \frac{\hbar}{2}
$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Sparky_ said:
2 equations

You have the signs wrong. The eigenvalue should be ##- \hbar / 2##.
 
  • #33
crap, went too fast

(I did on scratch paper earlier the "characteristic equation" deal for finding eigenvalues - the determinant resulting from subtracting the eigenvalues times the identity matrix and setting to zero ...

there I got $$ \pm \frac{\hbar}{2} $$

I should have caught that. I knew there was a $$-\frac{\hbar}{2}$$

corrected:
$$
\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{pmatrix} 0&\frac{\hbar}{2}\\ \frac{\hbar}{2}&0\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} 1\\-1\end{pmatrix} = \lambda \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\begin{bmatrix} 1 \\ -1 \end{bmatrix} \\

-\frac{\hbar}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = \frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} \\
\frac{\hbar}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} = -\frac{\lambda}{\sqrt{2}} \\

\lambda = -\frac{\hbar}{2}
$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K