Suggestion Suggest "Informative" feedback reaction icon change away from the latest "pink brain" emoticon

  • Thread starter Thread starter Filip Larsen
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the recent change of the "Informative" reaction icon from a light bulb to a pink brain, which some users find unsuitable. Participants express a preference for the light bulb, associating it with clarity and enlightenment, while the brain is viewed as less fitting. Concerns are raised about the visibility of the icons in both dark and light modes, with suggestions for better color choices. The conversation also touches on the technical aspects of icon display and overlaps, seeking clarification from the forum's administration. Overall, the sentiment leans towards reverting to the light bulb icon for better representation.

For me the new pink brain Informative feedback icon ...

  • looks perfect, keep it!

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • looks wrong, I would prefer the light bulb back!

    Votes: 11 91.7%
  • looks wrong, I would prefer something else!

    Votes: 1 8.3%

  • Total voters
    12
  • Poll closed .
Filip Larsen
Gold Member
Messages
2,014
Reaction score
956
(Since Greg now has changed the Informative reaction back to be a light bulb, this original post and vote has served its purpose and probably won't make much sense for late comers. In case anyone still want to see that that pink brain icon was all about, post #10 has a snapshot of it).

OK, maybe I'm just old and not up to the latest trends in emoticon use, but I just noticed the "Informative" reaction option has changed from the (for me) very fitting "light bulb" icon to the mentioned (for me) terrible "pink natural brain" icon. I mean, if Love reaction was to be replaced by image of human heart it would not really be used the same way as now would it?

Anyway, I suggest "Informative" is changed back to light bulb or something very similar. To get a feeling if I'm alone with this or not feel free to join in the (unofficial) vote, and/or reply if you would prefer something else for Informative.

Later: Edited after been informed that the correct term is "reaction" instead of "feedback" (but the vote still mentions "feedback", hope people can manage).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes russ_watters, martinbn and PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
I too believe the light-bulb icon is better, since it helps to symbolize "shining a light on informative information". The current 'brain' icon is not bad, but the light-bulb would be better. Not a bother to me either way.

@Filip Larsen , the terminology you want is "reaction" instead of "feedback".
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes russ_watters, Filip Larsen and BillTre
The pink brain is infantile, IMO. It's a mockery.
 
symbolipoint said:
the terminology you want is "reaction" instead of "feedback".
Thanks for letting me know (and I will give you an Informative reaction later if things go well :wink: )
 
I tried the lightbulb and the yellow doesn't look good in dark mode. Hard to see.
 
  • Sad
Likes Filip Larsen
Brains are not really pink.
They have parts that are whitish or grayish depending on if there are lots of fibers (whitish) present of just the cell bodies (grayish).

A brain having a brain bleed might be pink in places, but that brain would not be working well.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Wow
  • Like
Likes PeroK, Klystron, berkeman and 1 other person
BillTre said:
A brain having a brain bleed might be pink in places, but that brain would not be working well. .
Yeah, as a Medic, my first impression of it was not good...
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Likes Klystron and BillTre
Greg Bernhardt said:
I tried the lightbulb and the yellow doesn't look good in dark mode.
Thanks for the info. A bit strange because I have been using (my own) dark mode for years, also on PF, and Informative always looked OK to me, but perhaps my background is also a tad darker than PF dark mode background. Does this mean that no change is possible, or does it just mean you currently haven't located a suitable replacement and you might change it later if you find a good one? :smile:
 
  • Informative
Likes Greg Bernhardt
Filip Larsen said:
Thanks for the info. A bit strange because I have been using (my own) dark mode for years, also on PF, and Informative always looked OK to me, but perhaps my background is also a tad darker than PF dark mode background. Does this mean that no change is possible, or does it just mean you currently haven't located a suitable replacement and you might change it later if you find a good one? :smile:
Ok added, what do you think?
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Filip Larsen, DaveC426913 and BillTre
  • #10
I would not have mentioned it myself but, since you're asking, I do prefer
1747862103800.webp
over
1747862170293.webp
.

Still not sure of the diff between
1747862055524.webp
and
1747862079842.webp
. This exact question came up on another forum. There was some contrived suggestion of a topic wherein one might agree with something one does not like - or like someone that one does not agree with, but it seems too picayune a distinction for me.

Also, what ever happened to the
1747862231307.webp
emoticon? Oh, I see. It's now
1747862315113.webp
? Well, I prefer the chin-stroke.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Greg Bernhardt said:
Ok added, what do you think?
I personally think it looks much better than the brain, but I guess I can see what you mean that the bulb as small icon perhaps has very little structure other than a yellow shape and from a distance might look like a yellow head (2 min later: ah, it is because its the second one on the list and the preceding Like icon makes a small "dent" in it, see below). However, as large its clear enough (for me at least) and since it is the only reaction icon of that shape it should be easy to recognize for people even when small.

"Dented" small version (with my own dark mode background color):
1747866701692.webp


Thanks, Greg.
 
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #12
DaveC426913 said:
Also, what ever happened to the
1747862231307.webp
emoticon? Oh, I see. It's now
1747862315113.webp
? Well, I prefer the chin-stroke.
Intresting too..
 
  • #13
Filip Larsen said:
it is because its the second one on the list and the preceding Like icon makes a small "dent" in it
Yes, is the 'dent' which makes the icons overlap (and therefore harder to recognise) intentional? It seems to be caused by
CSS:
.reactionSummary > li {
    margin-left: -6px;
}
in core.less.

As displayed:
1751887200134.webp

After removal:
1751887256712.webp

Edit: actually I think the problem is a 16x16 icon in a 20x20 box so rather than removing the -6px left margin perhaps it is better set to -2px:

1751888147547.webp

or for the dark mode aficionados
1751888245755.webp


Also, while the new light bulb might be better in dark mode, it is now hard to see in light mode! A colour similar to the smiley face or thumbs up is surely best?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Filip Larsen
  • #14
pbuk said:
Yes, is the 'dent' which makes the icons overlap (and therefore harder to recognise) intentional? It seems to be caused by
CSS:
.reactionSummary > li {
    margin-left: -6px;
}
in core.less.
Bump for @Greg Bernhardt: are these overlapping icons intentional?
 
  • Like
Likes DaveC426913
  • #15
pbuk said:
Bump for @Greg Bernhardt: are these overlapping icons intentional?
Can you show me an example of this happening?
 
  • #16
I dont see the overlap either.
 
  • #18
I see there, three icons side-by-side. Not sure what ".... and 3 others" means; maybe some three more reactions not showing their reaction icons?
 
  • #19
symbolipoint said:
I see there, three icons side-by-side. Not sure what ".... and 3 others" means; maybe some three more reactions not showing their reaction icons?
It means that 6 people overall reacted to the post, and those 6 had reactions that were distributed among the icons shown.
 
  • Informative
Likes symbolipoint
Back
Top