Sum of an Infinite Arithmetic Series

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
1 reply · 3K views
IHateFactorial
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Somewhere I saw that the sum of the infinite arithmetic series

$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n = \frac{-1}{12}$$

Why exactly is this? I thought infinite arithmetic series had no solution? Also... WHY is it negative? Seems counter-intuitive that the sum of all the NATURAL numbers is a decimal, a negative decimal.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
IHateFactorial said:
Somewhere I saw that the sum of the infinite arithmetic series

$$\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}n = \frac{-1}{12}$$

Why exactly is this? I thought infinite arithmetic series had no solution? Also... WHY is it negative? Seems counter-intuitive that the sum of all the NATURAL numbers is a decimal, a negative decimal.
This is a popular topic and there is a lot of misinformation out there about it. As stated the LHS does not exist and certainly wouldn't add up to a fraction on the RHS, much less as a negative value.

This goes a bit deep and can be very confusing. The sum [math]\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} n [/math] is a representation of something called the Riemann Zeta function, [math]\zeta (-1)[/math]. The confusion arises because this form of the zeta function cited here does not converge. BUT we can use a technique called "analytic continuation" in the complex plane and write the zeta function in a form where [math]\zeta (-1)[/math] can be calculated and comes out to -1/12. (The form of the zeta function given by analytic continuation in this domain is not [math]\sum_{n = 1}^{\infty} n[/math] so we aren't taking an infinite sum.)

This might seem a bit like magic and I need to stress that you cannot do this for just any expression. Analytic continuation does not always increase the size of the domain that you can calculate a function over...the zeta function just happens to be one of them that you can do this with.

-Dan