Sum of Products of All Pairs of Natural Numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the sum of the products of all pairs of the first 'n' natural numbers. Participants utilize the formula for the sum of squares, σn² = n(n+1)(2n+1)/6, and explore polynomial expansion to derive the final expression. The derived formula for the sum is n[n+1/2]²[(3n-2)(n-1)/12]. The conversation emphasizes breaking down the problem into manageable summations and verifying the correctness of the derived expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of summation notation and series
  • Familiarity with the formula for the sum of squares, σn²
  • Basic knowledge of polynomial expansion
  • Concept of arithmetic progressions (AP)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the sum of squares formula, σn² = n(n+1)(2n+1)/6
  • Learn about polynomial expansion techniques in algebra
  • Explore the properties of arithmetic progressions and their applications in summation
  • Investigate combinatorial methods for calculating sums of products
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in combinatorial mathematics or series summation techniques.

draotic
Messages
52
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the sum of the products of every pair of the first 'n' natural numbers.


Homework Equations


sigma n^2 = n(n+1)(2n+1)/6


The Attempt at a Solution


S=1.2 + 1.3 + 1.4 ...+ 2.3 + 2.4 ...n-1(n)
i can't figure out how to proceed ..
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about expanding the expression (1+2+...+n)*(1+2+...+n) like it was a polynomial.
 
(1+2+...n)^2 = (1.1 +2.2 ...n.n) + (1.2+1.3 ...1.n ...n-1.n)
please guide me further
 
You have a formula for summing the squares 1^2+2^2+...+n^2. You've probably got a formula for summing 1+2+..+n as well. Use it.
 
That's a good question and very conceptual. Try to break your problem into a general summation which can be expressed by a variable.

gif.latex?\large%20S=1.1+1.2+...+2.3+2.4+...gif

gif.latex?\large%20\Rightarrow%20S=1(2+3+...+n)+2(3+4+...+n)+...gif


Don't you worry about n(0), that thing is created to be zero, as you'll see in next step.

We can take the numbers outside the brackets as r, whose value varies from r=1,2,...,(n-1),n.

Now about the summation of numbers inside the bracket. You can take out their sum by AP. Since the first term of any bracket is (r+1) and the last term is always n, the number of terms can be figured as (n-r), since you're not counting first r natural number.

Therefore, our general term can be written as:

gif.gif


NOTE: Try considering r=n. It is a huge relief that Tn=0, or else we would have to manually subtract it in the end. Always consider manually checking last term in the general term, they may give you a problem.

Now fearlessly take summation of our series.

gif.gif


Now open it and you'll get the following:

gif.gif


Simple equation in summation of r, r2 and r3
 
AGNuke said:
That's a good question and very conceptual. Try to break your problem into a general summation which can be expressed by a variable.

gif.latex?\large%20S=1.1+1.2+...+2.3+2.4+...gif

gif.latex?\large%20\Rightarrow%20S=1(2+3+...+n)+2(3+4+...+n)+...gif


Don't you worry about n(0), that thing is created to be zero, as you'll see in next step.

We can take the numbers outside the brackets as r, whose value varies from r=1,2,...,(n-1),n.

Now about the summation of numbers inside the bracket. You can take out their sum by AP. Since the first term of any bracket is (r+1) and the last term is always n, the number of terms can be figured as (n-r), since you're not counting first r natural number.

Therefore, our general term can be written as:

gif.gif


NOTE: Try considering r=n. It is a huge relief that Tn=0, or else we would have to manually subtract it in the end. Always consider manually checking last term in the general term, they may give you a problem.

Now fearlessly take summation of our series.

gif.gif


Now open it and you'll get the following:

gif.gif


Simple equation in summation of r, r2 and r3
Thanx for the reply
summing up your equation , i got
n[n+1/2]^2 [ (3n-2)(n-1) / 12 ]
will you check if this right . . . .
 
i am told that this is a better way to do it..
but i can't begin to undrstand the (sigma n)^2 - sigma n^2 thing
 

Attachments

  • Sol.PNG
    Sol.PNG
    18.4 KB · Views: 493
gif.latex?\large%20\frac{\left%20(\sum_{r=1}^{n}r%20\right%20)^{2}-\sum_{r=1}^{n}r^{2}}{2}.gif


This is a better solution, but I was afraid of it since I was not fully sure whether it will work or not, but I guess in the end, my hunch was right! :biggrin:

Its simple enough. Let's see.

gif.latex?\large%20\left%20(\sum_{r=1}^{n}r%20\right%20)^{2}=(1+2+...+n)(1+2+...+n).gif


gif.latex?\large%20\Rightarrow%201(1+2+...+n)+2(1+2+...+n)+...+n(1+2+...gif


gif.latex?\large%201.1+1.2+...+2.1+2.2+...+3.3+...n.gif


As you can see, after multiplying, some squares are obtained, which we remove by Ʃr2.

Further more, You can see every non-square term will repeat two time, so we divide the remaining part by 2 and here we are.
 
AGNuke said:
gif.latex?\large%20\frac{\left%20(\sum_{r=1}^{n}r%20\right%20)^{2}-\sum_{r=1}^{n}r^{2}}{2}.gif


This is a better solution, but I was afraid of it since I was not fully sure whether it will work or not, but I guess in the end, my hunch was right! :biggrin:

Its simple enough. Let's see.

gif.latex?\large%20\left%20(\sum_{r=1}^{n}r%20\right%20)^{2}=(1+2+...+n)(1+2+...+n).gif


gif.latex?\large%20\Rightarrow%201(1+2+...+n)+2(1+2+...+n)+...+n(1+2+...gif


gif.latex?\large%201.1+1.2+...+2.1+2.2+...+3.3+...n.gif


As you can see, after multiplying, some squares are obtained, which we remove by Ʃr2.

Further more, You can see every non-square term will repeat two time, so we divide the remaining part by 2 and here we are.
Thanx AGNuke , that was some real help !
 
  • #10
Welcome! :wink:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K