Sum of Series: Li_{-b}(e^{ia}) & Cesaro Sum C(k,a,b)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zetafunction
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series Summation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The series \(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}n^{b}e^{ian}\) converges to the polylogarithm function \(Li_{-b}(e^{ia})\) for real values of \(a\) and \(b\). The discussion highlights the series as a Dirichlet series that converges locally uniformly towards a holomorphic function in the right half-plane of complex numbers. The local uniformity allows for the interchange of summation and differentiation, which can be proven using measure theory. The Cesaro sum \(C(k,a,b)\) for \(k > b\) remains an open question, particularly for \(a=0\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of polylogarithm functions, specifically \(Li_{-b}(e^{ia})\)
  • Knowledge of Dirichlet series and their convergence properties
  • Familiarity with complex analysis, particularly holomorphic functions
  • Basic principles of measure theory and the dominated convergence theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of polylogarithm functions and their applications
  • Study Dirichlet series and their convergence criteria in complex analysis
  • Learn about holomorphic functions and their significance in complex analysis
  • Explore measure theory and the dominated convergence theorem in detail
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students specializing in complex analysis, particularly those interested in series summation techniques and polylogarithm applications.

zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
what is the sum of this series ??

\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}n^{b}e^{ian} for every a and b to be Real numbers

from the definition of POlylogarithm i would say \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}n^{b}e^{ian}= Li_{-b}(e^{ia})

however i would like to know if the sum is Cesaro summable and what it would be its Cesaro sum C(k,a,b) for k bigger than 'b' , and a=0 , thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi!

I'm not really familiar with the Cesaro summability, so I'm not possibly answering your question.. at least not the last one.

Anyway - here's my suggestion:

First, let c:=ia

The series you typed is a Dirichlet series. It converges locally unimormly towards a holomorphic function on some right half plain of C. Now the local uniformity allows us to interchange summation and differentiation/integration. (another way of proving the latter is by using measure theory and the counting measure on R or C - limits can be interchanged since the 'e-to-the-i*n' term is bounded for every n by the constant function 1 and the e-function is monotone, so the partial sum would also be bounded (dominated convergence thm.))

This particular series is obtainable from the series containing only the e-term by differentiating it b times wrt. c . So we could pull out a differential operator to the b-th power in front of the sum by linearity. Then realising the series contains only a 'e-to-the-i' term I could try using the geometric series and do some algebra...


I hope this could be somehow helpful

best regards,
marin
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K