Sum of Tangents Squared of Odd Angles

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter santa
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angles Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the sum of the squares of the tangent function for odd angles from 1° to 89°. Participants explore various mathematical approaches, conjectures, and calculations related to this sum, including its potential properties and relationships to other mathematical concepts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the sum as \tan^2{(1^\circ)}+\tan^2{(3^\circ)}+\tan^2{(5^\circ)}+\ldots+\tan^2{(89^\circ)}.
  • Another participant suggests that the sum might be related to a constant referred to as "The Gib-Z Constant."
  • A participant expresses difficulty in simplifying the sum and notes their limited knowledge of arithmetic and geometric progressions.
  • One conjecture posits that the sum of the squares of the tangents of these angles results in a transcendental number.
  • A participant outlines a method using De Moivre's theorem and the binomial formula to derive relationships involving the tangent function.
  • Concerns are raised about potential degree-radian conversion errors in calculations, with one participant noting discrepancies in their results.
  • Symmetries in the tangent and cotangent functions are discussed, leading to an exploration of relationships between the sums of these functions.
  • Multiple participants provide numerical estimates for the sum, with values varying and some expressing uncertainty about their calculations.
  • One participant mentions using software (Maple and Pari) to compute the sum, reporting consistent results around 4005.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the accuracy of their calculations and the nature of the sum, with no consensus reached on a definitive answer. Some calculations yield values around 4005, while others suggest different results, indicating ongoing uncertainty.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential issues with degree-radian conversions and the accuracy of numerical methods used in their calculations. There are also references to the complexity of the problem and the need for further investigation into the properties of the sum.

santa
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
[tex]\tan^2{(1^\circ)}+\tan^2{(3^\circ)}+\tan^2{(5^\circ)}+\ldots+\tan^2{(89^\circ)}[/tex]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Moved to Homework Help forums. santa, you need to show us your own work, before we can offer tutorial assistance.
 
The Gib-Z Constant.
 
berkeman said:
Moved to Homework Help forums. santa, you need to show us your own work, before we can offer tutorial assistance.

Okay, I was informed via friendly PM that santa is offering this kind of question as a puzzle, not as a homework or coursework question. I'm moving santa's threads back to General Math for now.

santa, maybe preface your puzzle posts with a brief note, so that other Mentors who are stopping by don't move your puzzles to Homework Help like I did. Thanks!
 
4005? (Otherwise known as The Gib-Z Constant.)
 
Hm...this seems difficult with my limited knowledge as I only know AP and GP...


So far all I have simplified that to is

[tex]\sum_{n=0} ^{44} tan^2(2n+1)[/tex]


and that really didn't help...
 
The number is probably transcendental, since the the sine or cosine (and hence tangent) of x is transcendental if x is not a rational multiple of pi. My conjecture is that the squares and sum of these transcendental numbers gives another ugly transcendental number, which until further investigation remains to be named after me =]
 
Here's an outline of what I did:

Start with De Moivre and the binomial formula:
[tex]\cos nx + i \sin nx = (\cos x + i \sin x)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} i^k {n \choose k} \cos^{n-k} x \sin^k x[/tex]

In particular,
[tex]\cos nx = \sum_{k=0}^{\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor} (-1)^k {n \choose 2k} \cos^{n-2k} x \sin^{2k} x[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow \frac{\cos nx}{\cos^n x} = \sum_{k=0}^{\lfloor \frac{n}{2} \rfloor} (-1)^k {n \choose 2k} \left(\tan^2 x\right)^k[/tex]

Now is where it gets tricky. Notice that if we let n=90, we get:
[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{45} (-1)^k {90 \choose 2k} \left(\tan^2 x\right)^k = 0[/tex]

Plug x=1,3,...,89 into this, and note that the 45 numbers tan^2(1), tan^2(3), ..., tan^2(89) are all distinct. Thus they are precisely the roots of the degree 45 polynomial
[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{45} (-1)^k {90 \choose 2k} t^k[/tex]

So from this we get a bunch of equalities, like

[tex]\sum_{n=0}^{44} \tan^2(2n+1) = {90 \choose 2\cdot44}= 4005[/itex]<br /> <br /> and<br /> <br /> [tex]\prod_{n=0}^{44} \tan^2(2n+1) = {90 \choose 0} = 1[/itex][/tex][/tex]
 
Last edited:
Did you do that all in radians or degrees :( ?
 
  • #10
Degrees. I'm actually worried that I made a degree-radian slip somewhere. Maple seems to agree with my formula for the product, but not the sum.

Edit:
Nevermind - Maple does agree - I just forgot to square my tans! I got 4004.999892 for the sum and 0.9999999699 for the product, which is good enough.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Taking the last 5 terms manually yields about 4015 :( Already over, but you can't be b far off since the terms are decreasing pretty fast...
 
  • #12
I get ~3883 for the first five terms!? You probably added in an even number somewhere. :-p
 
  • #13
I'm not really satisfied with my solution, but haven't been able to find anything better. I did notice some curious symmetries though:

S = tan2(1) + tan2(3) + ... + tan2(87) + tan2(89) = tan2(90-89) + tan2(90 - 87) + ... + tan2(90-3) + tan2(90-1) = cot2(1) + ... + cot2(89)

2S = (tan2(1) + tan2(3) + ... + tan2(87) + tan2(89)) + (cot2(1) + ... + cot2(89))
= (tan2(1) + cot2(1)) + ... + (tan2(89) + cot2(89))

Now everything on the left of the centre (that is: (tan2(45) + cot2(45)) = 2) is equal to the corresponding thing on the right of it, e.g. (tan2(1) + cot2(1)) = (tan2(89) + cot2(89)).

But I haven't been able to get very far with this, and I'm too sleepy to continue trying. Maybe someone who's a trig magician can take it from here!
 
  • #14
I readded the last 5 terms and I got around 3909.5, which still isn't what you have but I'll just take your calculation. What does Maple give for the sum?
 
  • #15
Looks to me like morphism has it nailed. Maple gives me 4005 to more than 1000sf, and the sum for the largest 5 terms is 3883.069... even manually on a calculator.
 
  • #16
Looks like problem is solved then =] By the incredible work of morphism !
 
  • #17
mda said:
Looks to me like morphism has it nailed. Maple gives me 4005 to more than 1000sf, and the sum for the largest 5 terms is 3883.069... even manually on a calculator.

Likewise: on Pari, to 10,000 digits, I also get 4005. That took almost 30 seconds!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
230K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K