Summation analogue of the factorial operation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gabee
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorial Summation
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around the concept of a summation analogue to the factorial operation, specifically questioning whether an operation exists for summing natural numbers akin to the factorial's product definition. The summation of the first n natural numbers is established as n(n+1)/2, with a detailed explanation of how pairs of terms contribute to this result. The conversation also references triangular numbers and their relation to summation, along with a nod to Gauss's method of summing numbers efficiently. The discussion highlights the mathematical elegance of summation and its historical context.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic arithmetic operations (addition and multiplication)
  • Familiarity with factorial notation and its definition
  • Knowledge of summation notation (sigma notation)
  • Basic concepts of algebra and number theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties and applications of triangular numbers
  • Explore the derivation and applications of the formula for the sum of the first n natural numbers
  • Learn about Bernoulli numbers and their significance in number theory
  • Investigate the historical context of Gauss's summation technique
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students brushing up on calculus concepts, and anyone interested in the relationships between summation and factorial operations.

gabee
Messages
175
Reaction score
0
Is there such a thing?

The factorial is usually defined as
n! = \prod_{k=1}^n k if k is a natural number greater than or equal to 1.

Is there an operation that is defined as
\sum_{k=0}^n k
if one wants to find, for instance, something like 5+4+3+2+1?

I ask because I was thinking about binomial expansions and Pascal's triangle, and I'm just curious as to why the factorial operation (!) exists for products but I've never heard of such a thing for sums.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
No, defining that operation would be fairly useless: the summation is equal to n(n+1)/2.
 
Haha, that's why :P
 
In case you wish to see why, we wish to sum : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 \cdots n. Add the last term, and the first term. We get n+1. Add the second last term, and the second term, we still get n+1. Add the third, and third last, we still get n+1. How many pairs of these (n+1)'s are there? Well if n is even we can easily see the number of pairs is n/2.

However is n is an Odd number, then the number of pairs that add up to (n+1) is (n-1)/2. And we still have a term in the middle, and we can see that one is (n+1)/2. Simple algebra gives the same sum : n(n+1)/2
 
Yes, I've heard the legend about Gauss as a child being asked to sum the numbers 1 through 100 and he realized he could do it in this way...that guy was a genius. I am trying to brush up on my Cal I and II this summer so I can commit this sort of thing to memory again. Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K