Summation and nCk Homework: Understanding the Formula and Its Application

  • Thread starter Thread starter holezch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Summation
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the manipulation of summations involving binomial coefficients, specifically the expressions involving \( nCk \) and their relationship to the function products \( f(x)g(x) \). Participants are exploring the implications of combining these summations and the properties of binomial coefficients.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss factoring out common terms and examining specific cases for small values of \( n \). There is an exploration of changing indices in summations to demonstrate equivalences. Questions arise about the validity of combining the summations and the nature of binomial coefficients.

Discussion Status

The conversation is active, with participants providing insights and alternative approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the manipulation of the summations, and there is a recognition of the potential equivalence of the two summations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the constraints of homework rules, focusing on understanding the relationships between the terms without reaching definitive conclusions or solutions.

holezch
Messages
251
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


n+1 , n
[tex]\sum[/tex] (nCk-1) f(x)g(x) + [tex]\sum[/tex] (nCk) f(x)g(x)
k=1 , k = 0 (for first and second summations respectively) I can't just say that that is equal to:

n+1
[tex]\sum[/tex] (n+1 C k) f(x)g(x)
k=0

since the (nC k-1) and (nC k) above are kind of illusionary, (n C k-1) starts at 1 and ends when k = n+1 so it's just exactly the same as the (nC k) summation

right?

thanks

Homework Equations



n+1 C k = n C k-1 + n C k

The Attempt at a Solution



see above
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing I would do is factor out the "f(x)g(x)". This is
[tex]f(x)g(x)\left(\sum_{k=1}^{n+1} _nC_{k-1}+ \sum_{k=0}^n _nC_k\right)[/tex]

Then it might be a good idea to look at a couple of simple cases. For example, if n= 1, this is
[tex]f(x)g(x)\left(_1C_0+ _1C_1+ _1C0+ _1C_1\right)[/tex]
[tex]= f(x)g(x)\left(1+ 1+ 1+ 1\right= 4f(x)g(x)[/tex]
and if n= 2, this is
[tex]f(x)g(x)\left(_2C_0+ _2C_1+ _2C_2+ _2C_0+ _2C_1+ _2C_2\right)[/tex]
[tex]= f(x)(g(x))\left(1+ 2+ 1+ 1+ 2+ 1\right)= 8f(x)g(x)[/tex]

You cannot just add the binomial coefficients because they start and end with the different values of k but it certainly looks as if the two sums give exactly the same thing. You can try to prove that by changing the index on, say, the first sum. In the first sum, if we let i= k-1, then when k= 1, i=0 and when k= n+1, i= n. Also, k= i+ 1 so [itex]_nC_{k-1}= _nC_i[/itex]. That is, [itex]\sum_{k=1}^{n+1} _nC_{k-1}= \sum_{i=0}^n _nC_i[/itex] which is exactly the same as [itex]\sum_{k=0}^n _nC_i[/itex] so your sum is [itex]2f(x)g(x)\sum_{k=0}^n _nC_i[/itex].

And that sum is easy- why are those numbers called "binomial coefficients"?
 
HallsofIvy said:
The first thing I would do is factor out the "f(x)g(x)". This is
[tex]f(x)g(x)\left(\sum_{k=1}^{n+1} _nC_{k-1}+ \sum_{k=0}^n _nC_k\right)[/tex]

Then it might be a good idea to look at a couple of simple cases. For example, if n= 1, this is
[tex]f(x)g(x)\left(_1C_0+ _1C_1+ _1C0+ _1C_1\right)[/tex]
[tex]= f(x)g(x)\left(1+ 1+ 1+ 1\right= 4f(x)g(x)[/tex]
and if n= 2, this is
[tex]f(x)g(x)\left(_2C_0+ _2C_1+ _2C_2+ _2C_0+ _2C_1+ _2C_2\right)[/tex]
[tex]= f(x)(g(x))\left(1+ 2+ 1+ 1+ 2+ 1\right)= 8f(x)g(x)[/tex]

You cannot just add the binomial coefficients because they start and end with the different values of k but it certainly looks as if the two sums give exactly the same thing. You can try to prove that by changing the index on, say, the first sum. In the first sum, if we let i= k-1, then when k= 1, i=0 and when k= n+1, i= n. Also, k= i+ 1 so [itex]_nC_{k-1}= _nC_i[/itex]. That is, [itex]\sum_{k=1}^{n+1} _nC_{k-1}= \sum_{i=0}^n _nC_i[/itex] which is exactly the same as [itex]\sum_{k=0}^n _nC_i[/itex] so your sum is [itex]2f(x)g(x)\sum_{k=0}^n _nC_i[/itex].

And that sum is easy- why are those numbers called "binomial coefficients"?

the sum of all nCk's is just 2^n, is that what you mean?
 
Yes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K