Summation Notation: Is \sum_{u,v} Equal to \sum_u\sum_v?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gnome
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Summation
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 4K views
gnome
Messages
1,031
Reaction score
1
Is

[tex]\sum_{u,v} H_{i-u,j-v}F_{u,v}[/tex]

the same as

[tex]\sum_u\sum_v H_{i-u,j-v}F_{u,v}[/tex]

?

(Don't worry about what H,F,i,j,u,v are. I'm only asking about the notation.)
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I only see this in the case that there could be no confusion about the range of the indicies, and so I would say yes, they are the same.
 
Yes, thanks, assuming that the ranges of the indices are unambiguous...

I read the first form in a textbook; the context is applying convolution to image data, and I don't see any way to interpret it other than as a double summation. I just wanted some reassurance that I'm not overlooking something.
 
It's written that way to save space. Similar to writing [tex]\int f \, dV[/tex] rather than [tex]\int \int \int f \, dx\, dy\, dz[/tex]