Summation of a sequence by parts.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the summation of a piecewise function defined as f(n) for a given positive x. The function is defined as zero for x < 1/(n+1), sin²(x/π) for 1/(n+1) ≤ x ≤ 1/n, and zero for x > 1/n. The summation results in f(x) equating to 2sin²(1/(3π)) when x = 1/3, illustrating that for integer values of n, f(x) can be expressed as 2sin²(1/(πx)), while for non-integer values, it simplifies to sin²(1/(πx)). This establishes a clear understanding of how the summation behaves based on the value of x.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of piecewise functions
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically sine
  • Familiarity with summation notation (sigma notation)
  • Basic concepts of limits and sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the properties of piecewise functions in calculus
  • Study the behavior of trigonometric functions within limits
  • Learn about sigma notation and its applications in series
  • Investigate the convergence of sequences and series
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying calculus, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of piecewise functions and their summations.

r.a.c.
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I hope can someone clarify this for me.

I have a sequence f(of n) which is like this:

fn(x) = [tex]0-- if--x<\frac{1}{n+1}[/tex]
is = [tex]sin^2(x/pi)--if--\frac{1}{n+1}<=x<=\frac{ 1}{n}[/tex]
is = [tex]0--if--\frac{1}{n}<x[/tex]

(the - are for spaces because I don't know how to do it. Nothing is negative)

Then there is a summation (sigma) of f(of n). I don't understand how can there be such a summation for sequence by parts or how it would look like. Can anyone explain please?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given any positive x, there exist N such that x< 1/(N+1) and M such that x> 1/M. That is, the sum is a finite sum, between N and M, for every x.

For example, if x= 1/3, then, Since 1/3< 1/(0+1), f0(1/3)= 0. Since 1/3< 1/(1+1), f1(1/3)= 0. Since 1/(2+1)= 1/3< 1/2, f2(1/3)= [itex]sin^2(1/(3\pi)[/itex]. Since 1/(3+1)< 1/3= 1/3, f3(1/3)= [itex]sin^2(1/(3\pi))[/itex]. Since 1/3< 1/4, f4(1/3)= 0 and fn(1/3)= 0 for all larger n.

The sum is [itex]f(x)= 2sin^2(1/(3\pi))[/itex].

In fact, it looks to me like, if x= 1/n for some integer n, [itex]f(x)= 2sin^2(1/(\pi x))[/itex] while if x is any other number, [itex]f(x)= sin^2(1/(\pi x))[/itex] since if x= 1/n, we have both x= 1/n and x= 1/((n-1)+1) and so sum two terms, while if x is not, we have only 1/(n+1)< x< 1/n for a single n.
 
Hmmm, I think I get it. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
7K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K