Summing up binomial coefficients

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a complex expression involving binomial coefficients, specifically focusing on sums of coefficients that are multiples of 3 and their relationship to other coefficients. The original poster seeks assistance in simplifying and understanding the expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest expanding the squares in the expression and exploring specific values of n to identify patterns. There is mention of the symmetry and properties of binomial coefficients, as well as the potential use of cube roots of unity to analyze the series.

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights and alternative approaches, including simplifications and suggestions for further exploration. The discussion is active with multiple lines of reasoning being explored, but there is no explicit consensus on a solution or method at this point.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for additional binomial coefficients and mention the importance of understanding the properties of these coefficients in relation to the problem. There is also a hint of missing information regarding the original question posed by the poster.

utkarshakash
Gold Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


The value of [itex]((^n C_0+^nC_3+...) - \frac{1}{2} (^nC_1+^nC_2+^nC_4+^nC_5+...))^2 + \frac{3}{4} (^nC_1-^nC_2+^nC_4-^nC_5...)^2[/itex]


The Attempt at a Solution


I can see that in the left parenthesis, the first bracket contains terms which are multiples of 3 and in the second bracket, those terms are missing. I know it's a much less attempt from my part but that's all I can see. Please help XO
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sums go to n?
Have you tried expanding out the squares?
You'll need extra binomial coefficients.

The coefficients have a symmetry amongst other properties - you should make a cheat-sheet of the basic properties.

Also - try n=2 and n=3 and expand them out explicitly and see if you find a pattern.

BTW: what was the question?
 
Try using powers of a cube root of 1. E.g. look at how the imaginary parts of those change and compare it with the behaviour of the last series.
 
haruspex said:
Try using powers of a cube root of 1. E.g. look at how the imaginary parts of those change and compare it with the behaviour of the last series.

I could simplify the first series to
'[itex]\dfrac{(\omega ^2n + \omega ^n)^2}{4}[/itex]

But I still can't get the second one. Here's my attempt

[itex](1+\omega)^n + (1+ \omega ^2)^n = 2(C_0+C_3+...) - (C_1+C_2+C_4...)[/itex]
 
utkarshakash said:
I could simplify the first series to
'[itex]\dfrac{(\omega ^2n + \omega ^n)^2}{4}[/itex]

But I still can't get the second one. Here's my attempt

[itex](1+\omega)^n + (1+ \omega ^2)^n = 2(C_0+C_3+...) - (C_1+C_2+C_4...)[/itex]

Consider other linear combinations of (1+1)n, (1+ω)n, (1+ω2)n.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K