MHB Sunshine's questions at Yahoo Answers regarding solids of revolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarkFL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Revolution Solids
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the volumes of solids of revolution using the disk/washer method for two regions defined by specific curves. For part (a), the volume of the solid formed by revolving the region bounded by y=x^3 and y=2x around the x-axis is calculated to be 64√2π/21. In part (b), the volume for the region bounded by y=x^2+5, y=3, and x=-2 to x=2 when revolved around the y-axis is determined to be 16π. Both calculations are verified using the shell method, confirming the accuracy of the results. The discussion emphasizes the importance of visualizing the regions and applying integration techniques correctly.
MarkFL
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
13,284
Reaction score
12
Here are the questions:

Calculus Question-disk/washer method?

a)Let R be the region bounded by the given curves. Sketch R on a graph. If R is revolved around the x-axis, find the volume of the solid revolution by the disk/washer method.
y=x^3
y=2x

b)Let R be the region bounded by the given curves. Sketch R on a graph. IF R is revolved around the y-axis find the volume of the solid revolution by the disk/washer method.
y=x^2+5
y=3
x=-2
x=2

I have posted a link there to this topic so the OP can see my work.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: Subshine's questions at Yahoo! Answers regarding solids of revolution

Hello sunshine,

a) Here is a graph of the region $R$ to be revolved about the $x$-axis:

View attachment 899

We may revolve the area shaded in red and then double the volume to find the requested volume.

The volume of an arbitrary washer is:

$$dV=\pi\left(R^2-r^2 \right)\,dx$$

where:

$$R=2x$$

$$r=x^3$$

and so we have:

$$dV=\pi\left((2x)^2-\left(x^3 \right)^2 \right)\,dx=\pi\left(4x^2-x^6 \right)\,dx$$

To determine the limits of integration, we may equate the two functions:

$$x^3=2x$$

$$x\left(x^2-2 \right)=0$$

$$x=0,\,\pm2$$

Hence, summing the disks by integrating, we find:

$$V=2\pi\int_0^{\sqrt{2}}4x^2-x^6\,dx=2\pi\left[\frac{4}{3}x^3-\frac{1}{7}x^7 \right]_0^{\sqrt{2}}=\frac{16\sqrt{2}\pi}{21}\left(7-3 \right)=\frac{64\sqrt{2}\pi}{21}$$

Now, whenever possible, I like to use the shell method to check my work.

The volume of an arbitrary shell is:

$$dV=2\pi rh\,dy$$

where:

$$r=y$$

$$h=y^{\frac{1}{3}}-\frac{y}{2}$$

and so we have:

$$dV=2\pi y\left(y^{\frac{1}{3}}-\frac{y}{2} \right)\,dy=2\pi\left(y^{\frac{4}{3}}-\frac{y^2}{2} \right)\,dy$$

To determine the limits of integration, we may equation the two functions:

$$y^{\frac{1}{3}}=\frac{y}{2}$$

$$y-2y^{\frac{1}{3}}=0$$

$$y^{\frac{1}{3}}\left(y^{\frac{2}{3}}-2 \right)$$

$$y=0,\,\pm2\sqrt{2}$$

Thus, summing the shells by integration we find:

$$V=4\pi\int_0^{2\sqrt{2}}y^{\frac{4}{3}}-\frac{y^2}{2}\,dy=4\pi\left[\frac{3}{7}y^{\frac{7}{3}}-\frac{1}{6}y^3 \right]_0^{2\sqrt{2}}=\frac{16\sqrt{2}\pi}{21}\left(18-14 \right)=\frac{64\sqrt{2}\pi}{21}$$

This checks with the result we obtained using the washer method.

b) Here is a graph of the region $R$ to be revolved about the $y$-axis:

View attachment 900

We need only revolve the area shaded in red to find the requested volume.

Using the disk/washer method, we should observe that for $3\le y\le5$ we simply have a right circular cylinder of radius 2 and height 2, hence:

$$V_1=\pi(2)^22=8\pi$$

To find the remaining volume, we may use the washer method. The volume of an arbitrary washer is:

$$dV_2=\pi\left(R^2-r^2 \right)\,dy$$

where:

$$R=2$$

$$r=\sqrt{y-5}$$

and so we have:

$$dV_2=\pi\left((2)^2-\left(\sqrt{y-5} \right)^2 \right)\,dy=\pi\left(9-y \right)\,dy$$

Summing the washers by integration, we find:

$$V_2=\pi\int_5^9 9-y\,dy=\pi\left[9y-\frac{1}{2}y^2 \right]_5^9=\frac{\pi}{2}\left(\left(2\cdot9^2-9^2 \right)-(90-25) \right)=8\pi$$

Thus, the total volume is:

$$V=V_1+V_2=8\pi+8\pi=16\pi$$

Now, using the shell method to check our work, we find the volume of an arbitrary shell is:

$$dV=2\pi rh\,dx$$

where:

$$r=x$$

$$h=x^2+5-3=x^2+2$$

and so we have:

$$dV=2\pi x\left(x^2+2 \right)\,dx=2\pi\left(x^3+2x \right)\,dx$$

Summing the shells by integrating, we find:

$$V=2\pi\int_0^2 x^3+2x\,dx=2\pi\left[\frac{1}{4}x^4+x^2 \right]_0^2=2\frac{\pi}{2}\left(2^4+2^4 \right)=16\pi$$

This checks with our previous result.
 

Attachments

  • sunshine1.jpg
    sunshine1.jpg
    6.7 KB · Views: 93
  • sunshine2.jpg
    sunshine2.jpg
    6.7 KB · Views: 87
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top