Supply Equation: Y=mx+c or S=d*Qty+c, Why P Instead of Qty?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shivajikobardan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Supply
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the representation of supply equations in economics, questioning why price (P) is used instead of quantity (Qty) on the x-axis. Participants argue that traditional diagrams often have the axes swapped, suggesting that quantity should be on the y-axis and price on the x-axis. This confusion stems from historical economic models where supply dictated price, contrasting with mathematical conventions. The conversation highlights a need for clarity in graphing practices within economics, emphasizing that the conventional approach may not align with mathematical norms. Ultimately, the debate reflects a deeper misunderstanding of how economic models have evolved and their graphical representation.
shivajikobardan
Messages
637
Reaction score
54
Homework Statement
straight line equation
Relevant Equations
y=mx+c
1657595260579.png


1657595274059.png


The equation for supply should be this-:

y=mx+c

S=m*Qty+c
=c+d*Qty

Why is P used instead of Qty?
I understand that supply increases as price increases relation is used here, but I just want to think graphically. This looks wrong according to that.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
The weird with the diagram is (I think) that it has the axes swapped. The quantity should be on the y-axis and the price on the x-axis.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
Delta2 said:
The weird with the diagram is (I think) that it has the axes swapped. The quantity should be on the y-axis and the price on the x-axis.
this is same in almost every textbooks about this book.


it looks like 1 person wrote sth and everyone copied it. but since everywhere it's written the same, i suspect there's some logic behind it.
 
The diagram isn't wrong , it just isn't done the usual way we do in math. It needs a 90 degree counterclockwise rotation.
 
Delta2 said:
The diagram isn't wrong , it just isn't done the usual way we do in math. It needs a 90 degree counterclockwise rotation.
i mean how can that be possible? so u r trying to say the x-axis is the y-axis and vice versa, right? can we just assume that?
 
shivajikobardan said:
i mean how can that be possible? so u r trying to say the x-axis is the y-axis and vice versa, right? can we just assume that?
Yes that's what I am saying, the axis are swapped. It looks like instead of graphing for example ##D=a-bP## they have graphed the equivalent ##P=\frac{1}{b}(a-D)##.
 
  • Like
Likes shivajikobardan
Delta2 said:
The weird with the diagram is (I think) that it has the axes swapped. The quantity should be on the y-axis and the price on the x-axis.
I just wanted to say that in Economics it is always the Quantity that comes on the x-axis and Price on y-axis.

We tend to think that "at price ##x## we would buy ##y## quantity of goods", but this system of graphing was developed when the classical model was prominent, that is "supply creates its own demand" and that "supply depends only on natural resources available (including labourers)", so suppliers used to decide the price, "Okay, we will sell our products at this price, eh?". It's more of Macroeconomic model, and then was taken in Microeconomics without any change.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes pbuk, malawi_glenn, FactChecker and 1 other person
Hall said:
I just wanted to say that in Economics it is always the Quantity that comes on the x-axis and Price on y-axis.
Yes, that is exactly right. So whilst in maths we are used to the relationship y = mx + c, where m is the slope and c the y-intercept, in this case it helps to consider instead x = m'y + c' where m' is the reciprocal of the slope and c' is the x-intercept.
 
Back
Top