How Do You Determine Supremum and Infimum Without Graphing?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter elizaburlap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs Supremum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on determining the supremum and infimum of sets without graphing, particularly for complex sequences. Participants emphasize the importance of limit points and suggest that both the supremum and infimum are limit points when finite. They discuss the convergence of sequences, specifically mentioning the sequence an = n(-1)^n, which approaches 0 as n approaches infinity. The conversation concludes that recognizing limits involves analyzing the behavior of expressions as they approach infinity, with trial-and-error being a practical method for testing potential bounds.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of supremum and infimum concepts
  • Familiarity with limit points in real analysis
  • Knowledge of convergence of sequences
  • Basic skills in analyzing mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of limit points in closed sets
  • Learn techniques for analyzing the convergence of sequences
  • Explore the concept of extended real numbers and their implications
  • Practice determining supremum and infimum through trial-and-error methods
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in real analysis, particularly those looking to deepen their understanding of supremum and infimum without relying on graphical methods.

elizaburlap
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In class, we have been introduced to the supremum and infimum concepts and shown them on graphs, but I am wondering how to go about deriving them, and determining if they are part of the set, without actually having to graph them- especially for more complicated sets.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you able to find "upper bound" and "lower bounds" for sets?
 
Some ideas:

Have you already seen limit points? If so, try showing that both the sup and the inf (when both are finite*) , are limit points of a set. Then look for a charcterization of closed sets in terms of limit points.


*This can be extended to the infinite case too, but let's start slowly.
 
How would you go about extending it to infinity?

In the text it has a few examples that span n from 1 to infinity.

Such as, an=n(-1)^n

I understand that it does converge, because an approaches 0 as n approaches infinity, but when the equations become more complicated, how to I recognise this without a graph?
 
elizaburlap said:
How would you go about extending it to infinity?

In the text it has a few examples that span n from 1 to infinity.

Such as, an=n(-1)^n

I understand that it does converge, because an approaches 0 as n approaches infinity, but when the equations become more complicated, how to I recognise this without a graph?

I actually used 'limit point' here a little too losely (specially since ∞ is not a real number); what I meant is that , in the case the sup is ∞ , the values would become indefinitely-large. In the extended reals, every 'hood (neighborhood) of ∞ would contain points of the set.

To recognize/determine the limit, I would suggest looking at the expression and trying to understand what happens with it as you approach ∞. Does it oscillate, increase, etc. If you cannot tell right away, consider trial-and-error. Assume a certain value is the Sup (Inf) , and put it to the test. That is the best I got; I cannot think of any sort of algorithm. It just seems to come down to practicing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
11K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K