Surely this will NOT work: violation of conservation of momentum?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the impossibility of a vehicle utilizing a rotating ball for propulsion, as it would initially push the vehicle in one direction and then reverse upon hitting an airbag, failing to create forward motion. The concept raises questions about automation and repeatability, highlighting that resetting the motion is not feasible. Any movement would result in the vehicle merely rocking back and forth without gaining progress. The conversation also touches on the inefficiency of relying on human power to drive such a mechanism. Ultimately, the thread was closed due to its violation of the Conservation of Momentum and the forum's policy against discussing propellantless propulsion.
gggnano
Messages
43
Reaction score
3


The rotating ball should push the vehicle first to the right and once it hits the airbag - to the left?? Even if this works, how are you going to automate it and repeat it?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Correct. You can't reset it without reversing the motion. The vehicle might rock back and forth, but it will not make any progress. You can make it ever more Rube-Goldbergian, and have the passenger supply the energy into moving it, but that's just an inefficient human-powered machine.

BTW, such perpetual motion discussion is a forbidden topic on PF, so I expect this thread won't be open long.
 
  • Like
Likes gggnano and topsquark
Yep, thread is closed, not because it's a PMM, but because we don't support discussions of "propellantless propulsion" with a violation of the Conservation of Momentum.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
465
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
723
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K