Surfers Unaware of Shark Nearby: Drone Photo Captures the Moment

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuruman
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the phenomenon of total internal reflection, which explains why a shark can be visible to a drone but not to surfers nearby. This optical effect allows the shark to be seen at near-normal angles, while surfers remain unaware. Participants reflect on the awareness of sharks and their hunting instincts, with anecdotes about personal encounters with sharks and their behavior in the water. The conversation also touches on the visibility challenges posed by water surface ripples and angles of observation, emphasizing that while there are no "dead zones" where sharks cannot be seen, visibility can be significantly reduced. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of underwater visibility and the intriguing nature of shark behavior in relation to human activity in the ocean.
kuruman
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Education Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
15,741
Reaction score
8,937
It wasn't until I saw a piece about this in the news that I realized what is going on and why. The drone photo shows a shark near a group of surfers. The surfers are completely unaware that the shark is there. Because of total internal reflection, the shark is visible to the drone at near-normal incidence but not to the surfers. Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the water! For the video, go here.

Shark and surfers.jpg
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and Lnewqban
Physics news on Phys.org
kuruman said:
Because of total internal reflection, the shark is visible to the drone at near-normal incidence but not to the surfers.
Wow. I hadn't connected that part...I bet the shark knows.
 
hutchphd said:
Wow. I hadn't connected that part...I bet the shark knows.
Maybe the shark actually does know. Could it be part of their hunting instinct for species that prey on animals that swim right at the surface?
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd
Bet the shark doesn't need it. They hunt just as well in complete darkness.

As one famous ichthyologist who was a specialist in lateral lines and ampules of Lorenzini said, "The moment someone sets foot in the ocean, every single higher animal within fifty feet knows you're there."
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
As a sixty odd year resident of the San Francisco Bay Area I've had the great pleasure of seeing two of these creatures in the flesh and it's utterly awe inspiring each and every time.

The *small* one was a 16 footer! One honestly gets the impression you are looking at a carnivorous submarine!
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre and hutchphd
Oh, and by "higher animal" she was referring to anything more complex than a sponge. Even creatures buried in the substrate.
 
  • Informative
Likes Keith_McClary
So at a reunion I learned a young man I knew in the Navy, who's personality was such that he was one of those others call a "force of nature" passed away merely 8 months after I last saw him, when I was discharged. I bring him up here because had absolutely no fear of sharks. Petty officer Tunby was his name. Worked in Airframes and Powerplants. (He died when his home built aircraft suffered a structural failure on its maiden flight. It had been fully inspected and signed off on too. Lost a wing at five thousand feet above the hard deck.)

When one dives around certain islands in the South Pacific you have to be aware that due to the very steep sides of some of these volcanic islands, and no continental shelf, sometimes strictly pelagic species will be found in inshore waters. On a trip I missed, my friends were snorkeling way out in an atoll and drew the attention of a group of adolescent short finned makos. (Those are one of the bitey kind.)

Since they couldn't drop and stay near the bottom like when scuba diving and the sharks appeared to be getting more excited every time one of them came up for air he decided "to Hell with this!" and charged them!

They scattered completely out of sight!

Turns out sharks are like Orcs or Sand People. They can be startled, at least temporarily.

I heard about another man in Florida who was fully dressed and walking his dog along a swimming pier and noticed a surfaced bull shark cruising up behind a group of adolescent girls.

His instant reaction?

He did a "cannonball" off of the pier and landed inches from the shark's face, for the same result. He worked at one of the sea parks and thought it was a calculated risk worth taking.
 
  • Like
Likes BillTre
kuruman said:
Because of total internal reflection, the shark is visible to the drone at near-normal incidence but not to the surfers.
You do understand that total internal reflection does not result in a "dead zone" above the water's surface where the shark cannot be seen, right?

"total internal reflection" means that that some ray angles from the shark do not emerge from the water. That leaves plenty of other ray angles that do. Those plenty cover the entire above-the-water hemisphere.

To be fair, low angles do mean a severe loss of visibility.
 
jbriggs444 said:
You do understand that total internal reflection does not result in a "dead zone" above the water's surface where the shark cannot be seen, right?

"total internal reflection" means that that some ray angles from the shark do not emerge from the water. That leaves plenty of other ray angles that do. Those plenty cover the entire above-the-water hemisphere.

To be fair, low angles do mean a severe loss of visibility.
I do understand that and I agree that there is no "dead zone" when one draws a ray diagram with the water surface perfectly flat which the ocean water is not. It seems reasonable to think that the severe loss of visibility that you mention is related to the ripples in the water surface. They scatter the light coming from the shark in many more directions when the viewing angle is close to the surface. The same ripples don't have much effect when the viewing angle is near-normal to the surface.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
  • #10
jbriggs444 said:
total internal reflection does not result in a "dead zone" above the water's surface where the shark cannot be seen
630px-ReflexionTotal_en.svg.png

Jfmelero (adapted by Gavin R Putland) Wikipedia
 
  • #11
Keith_McClary said:
View attachment 282996
Jfmelero (adapted by Gavin R Putland) Wikipedia
Right. For sub-surface rays at angles between normal and ##\theta_c##, one has continuing above-surface rays covering the entire above-water hemisphere. No "dead zones".
 
  • #12
jbriggs444 said:
No "dead zones".
That is true but the vertical angle subtended by the image of the shark will get narrower and narrower. (A submerged sphere image gets very oblate at low angle)) Coupled with a little surface chop and it no longer registers as a shark.
 
  • Like
Likes jbriggs444
  • #13
hutchphd said:
Coupled with a little surface chop and it no longer registers as a shark.
Yes, agreed.
 
  • Like
Likes hutchphd

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Back
Top