Surviving a fire by going underwater in the bath with a ball

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the feasibility of surviving a fire by submerging in a bath filled with water while breathing through a balloon filled with air. Participants consider the physical conditions of a fire, the effectiveness of this method, and the physiological aspects of breathing in confined spaces. The conversation touches on theoretical scenarios, personal experiences, and potential risks involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the viability of using a balloon to breathe underwater during a fire, citing the extreme temperatures that could lead to boiling water and the balloon's potential to burst.
  • One participant suggests that the original poster (OP) may have been unaware of the risks of carbon dioxide poisoning when breathing in a balloon, as they felt comfortable for extended periods.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the OP's childhood experience, proposing that the OP might have been inadvertently breathing in fresh air due to leaks in the balloon.
  • Concerns are raised about the rapid increase in carbon dioxide levels and the decrease in oxygen levels when rebreathing air from a balloon, suggesting that the method may not provide sufficient oxygen for survival.
  • Some participants highlight the dangers of radiant heat and direct flames affecting the water temperature in the bath, making it a hazardous environment.
  • One participant mentions the diving reflex, which could potentially help individuals stay underwater longer than expected.
  • There is a suggestion that using wet towels or sheets for protection and finding escape routes might be more effective than the proposed method.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the effectiveness of the proposed method. While some express skepticism and highlight the dangers, others explore the physiological aspects of breathing in confined spaces. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the feasibility of the OP's strategy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note various assumptions, such as the size of the balloon, the temperature of the water during a fire, and the physiological responses to carbon dioxide levels. These factors are not fully explored or resolved in the discussion.

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,932
Reaction score
283
I'm wondering whether it's possible to survive most fires by filling the bath with water and a balloon with air (it doesn't matter if it comes from human exhalation), then go underwater and breath through the balloon. When I was a kid I used to breath in a balloon that I would fill with air by exhalation. I could hold for 10-15 minutes easily and would stop by boredom, I never felt like I was about to miss oxygen.
I don't know whether this strategy has ever been tried before. Are you aware of any such case? It might be hard to stay underwater due to buoyancy. Also, I don't know how hot would the bath be when there's fire all over it (with and without water still flooding the bath).
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Some home fires due to materials it burns or consumes can be 900-1100 F. (well known) in temperatures and if it happens you are in such a bath you could become human soup! Not sure this is smart, best is the wet towels/sheets and get out as best you can. Others may have other insights.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Noisy Rhysling
fluidistic said:
I'm wondering whether it's possible to survive most fires by filling the bath with water and a balloon with air (it doesn't matter if it comes from human exhalation), then go underwater and breath through the balloon
No. A usual fire is far too hot. You would boil. And it very likely lasts too long.
. When I was a kid I used to breath in a balloon that I would fill with air by exhalation. I could hold for 10-15 minutes easily and would stop by boredom, I never felt like I was about to miss oxygen.
Probably because you cannot detect the carbon dioxide poisoning.
I don't know whether this strategy has ever been tried before. Are you aware of any such case? It might be hard to stay underwater due to buoyancy. Also, I don't know how hot would the bath be when there's fire all over it (with and without water still flooding the bath).
I'd say this plan is a childish fantasy, not more.
 
fresh_42 said:
... Probably because you cannot detect the carbon dioxide poisoning. ...
This surprises me, because I understood that it is the carbon dioxide which stimulates the need to breathe, not the lack of oxygen (or at least, much more than the lack of oxygen.) (I'm afraid I don't know any reliable reference for this - I'll try to find one.)

But as for the OP remark, I'm amazed, unless he had an enormous balloon. My guess would be that, as a child he was not a very careful experimenter and was breathing in a little fresh air all the time in order to keep the balloon full while it was leaking stale air.
Trying the experiment myself with a plastic bag (about 1 or 2 litre) rather than a balloon, I certainly noticed something within 1 minute and had to stop before 2 minutes (though I was not pushing myself beyond moderate discomfort.)
 
Merlin3189 said:
This surprises me, because I understood that it is the carbon dioxide which stimulates the need to breathe, not the lack of oxygen (or at least, much more than the lack of oxygen.) (I'm afraid I don't know any reliable reference for this - I'll try to find one.)
If you breath used air again and again, the ##CO_2## level rises and the ##O_2## level sinks. I thought this would basically be the same as what happens if one gets altitude sick, but you may be right. In any case the oxygen level will drop too fast. Maybe if the balloon is big enough it will last the 10 minutes the OP told, or since he was bored, it eventually was far less. Btw, I forgot to mention, that the balloon is the first thing to explode or burn in a fire. With a filled bath tube the chances to escape are far, far, far better, if one drowns as many towels as possibly, wrap oneself in and run.
 
One has heard of mouth-to-mouth resuscitation.
The O2 content of a breath might diminish 2% ( relative guess ) from ambient, Co2 increase to about 4%.
As long as the partial pressure of O2 in the 'bag" is above the partial pressure in the blood, the breather will receive by gas exchange some oxygen.
I can see the OP doing what he did fairly easy as a kid.
 
As mentioned above, the tub would turn into a soup pot. The water will be heated by radiant heat from nearby burning material and the tub itself will be heated by direct contact with flames and, again, radiant heat from flames not directly in contact with the tub. Additionally, when the floor burns away the tub will be supported on one end by piping that was not intended to support ~300 lbs. of water and the person's weight.

Stay low, know your escape routes, don't worry about your modesty. An aunt and uncle were naked in the front yard way back when, but they were alive.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
14K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K