Thermodynamics of a Fire Resistant Safe

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alex282
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fire Thermodynamics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the thermodynamics of fire-resistant safes and their effectiveness in protecting collectibles, specifically card collections, from fire damage. Participants explore various options for enhancing fire protection, including the use of fire-resistant cases and additional insulation, while considering the limitations of their current setups.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how quickly the internal temperature of a fire-resistant safe reaches its rated temperature of 248F during a fire, suggesting it may slowly increase towards this rating.
  • Another participant proposes that the internal temperature could surpass 248F within half an hour, potentially damaging the cards.
  • Suggestions include adding more fire-resistant insulation to the outside of the safe or placing the safe inside a used refrigerator for additional protection.
  • One participant mentions the possibility of using a sprinkler system with a fire suppression agent to protect the safe, noting the effectiveness of such systems in general.
  • A suggestion is made to consult with insurance companies for recommendations on fire-resistant safes and to seek advice from other collectors on best practices for fire protection.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effectiveness of various protective measures and the expected internal temperatures of the safe over time. There is no consensus on the best approach or the exact thermal dynamics involved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights uncertainties regarding the specific thermal properties of the materials involved, the variability of fire conditions, and the lack of precise data on the performance of the proposed solutions.

alex282
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
Hi,

I have been researching how to protect my card collection from the unlikely event of a house fire, however there is not enough data for me to estimate whether my set up is adequate or not. If anyone could approximate anything here without knowing all the exact variables (r-values) that would be very helpful.

Most of my cards are sealed or graded (encased) in plastic slabs which unfortunately warp at temperatures of just 150-200F. The solution to this is of course to buy a properly rated data safe which maintains the internal temperature below 150F. The problem with this is that it is almost impossible for me to fit one of these up the narrow stairs into my apartment. There are also no bank vaults near me, and collectibles insurance seems to be frowned upon by most collectors due to the bad value. This leaves me looking for something which is better than nothing and could hold out until the fire department (luckily 2 minutes away) arrive.Firstly I have a fire resistant safe with an industry recognised rating which guarantees to maintain the internal temperature below 248F for up to 1 hour during a ~1700F house fire. It appears to be composed of steel filled with concrete with a total wall thickness of 50mm.

So my first question is, what do you think the internal safe temperature would be 5, 10, 15, 30 and 45 minutes after a house fire reaches it? Would you say that the internal temperature quickly reaches the rating of 248F and then maintains it for an hour or would you say that it slowly increases towards the 248F rating at 1 hour?

safe1.jpg

Secondly I also have the option of putting a fire resistant case inside the safe.

The first case has a fire rating which guarantees to keep the internal temperature below 350F for up to 30 minutes during a 1700F house fire. It is composed of a cement within plastic and has a wall thickness of around 40mm. I think that this case is a good option since that the case isn't going to be exposed to temperatures of over 248F for an hour with being inside the safe. The only problem with this one is that it takes up most of the space inside the safe and two will not fit in side-by-side.

case1.png


The second case is a cheaply made one with various layers of "fire resistant" materials. This one doesn't have an official rating but my thinking is that if the internal temperature is below 248F, then perhaps even this cheap insulated case could help to keep the temperature inside itself below the 150-200F range to buy some more time. Do you think that 5-10mm of silicone/aluminium/fibreglass would make much difference in keeping the cards below 150F whilst the internal safe temperature rises towards 248F?

case2.png

The chance of a fire happening is extremely low. There are a lot of variables such as the starting point of a potential fire and how long it would take the fire department to arrive but ultimately it would be good to have some approximation such as the internal temperature would stay below xF for x minutes or that the cheap case would be completely useless.

Thanks for reading and any replies or suggestions
 
Last edited:
Science news on Phys.org
alex282 said:
Summary:: thermodynamics of fire resistant safe, heat transfer, conduction

slowly increases towards the 248F
And then surpasses that temperature.
In about half an hour, your cards will be feeling the effects towards perhaps melting.

You could try other options, such as adding more fire resistant insulation to the outside of the safe.
Or buy a used fridge, and put your safe in it, adding another layer of protection - you don't run the fridge.

The options you mentioned will help with prolonging the temperature elevation, except you loose space within the 'safe'.
( 'safe' since those types are to keep honest people out - I opened one in about half an hour, I think I ground the hinges off, and two people, or even one person can lift and carry them off and away )
 
You could use a sprinkler over the safe filled with a fire suppression and thermal blanket wetting agent. That will probably not be inexpensive.

Here's an example: https://firefreeze.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Cold-Fire-Technical-Book.pdf

That is a commercial product. I do not endorse it. It is just an example. But I have participated in fire department tests of such wetting agents.

Of course, the best protection comes when you suppress fire in the whole building. You may find that extraordinary measures to protect just the cards costs a significant fraction of the cost of a fire suppression system for the whole building. Sprinkler systems are very effective.
 
@alex282 have you considered asking your insurance company `(or several of them) about their recommendations / stipulations for fire resistant safes? The solution to your problem really lies in what's commercially available for you, rather than the PF view of things. That is unless you have the facility of building yourself a fire-safe room in your home. Try a patent search for some ideas.
Why not ask around the community of similar card collectors and find out what the really careful ones do about the problem?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
2K