Susskind's theoretical minimum

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the conversion of the Lagrangian to the Hamiltonian as presented in Leonard Susskind's theoretical framework. Specifically, the Lagrangian is defined as L=1/2ω (d/dt q)^2 - ω/2 q^2, leading to the Hamiltonian H=ω/2 (p^2 + q^2) where ω=sqrt(k/m). The participant clarifies that the Lagrangian represents kinetic energy minus potential energy, while the Hamiltonian represents the sum of these energies. Additionally, the equation of motion for a harmonic oscillator is discussed in relation to the Lagrangian formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of harmonic oscillators
  • Basic calculus, particularly derivatives
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations in classical mechanics
  • Explore the relationship between kinetic and potential energy in mechanical systems
  • Learn about the canonical momentum and its significance in Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Investigate the equations of motion for harmonic oscillators in greater detail
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators and researchers interested in the theoretical foundations of Lagrangian and Hamiltonian dynamics.

43arcsec
Messages
37
Reaction score
4
If anyone out there has worked through Susskind's book, I have two questions on the Lagrangian to Hamiltonian section, any help would be greatly appreciated:

1) In Lecture 8 exercise 2, he wants you to calculate take the Lagrangian of

L=1/2ω d/dt q - ω/2 q^2 as a Hamiltonian and says it equals (ω=sqrt(k/m) )

H=ω/2 ( p^2 + q^2)

From what I can tell from his book, the Lagrangian is kinetic energy - potential energy, while the Hamiltonian is kinetic energy plus the potential energy.

I've tried making this work every which way but couldn't come up with it.

Also, on the next page (158) he says the Lagrangian is (d/dt)^2 q = - ω q

This is just the equation of motion for a harmonic oscillator; how does this pass for a Lagragian that is supposed to be the K.E - P.E.?

Sorry if I'm missing something easy, but thanks for taking a look.

-Marc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First, I think L is maybe given by:

L=1/2ω (d/dt q)^2 - ω/2 q^2

From there, you can begin to calculate p = dL/d(qp) where qp = d/dt q .
Result follows immediately.
 
Canonical momentum, of course. Thanks Maajdl, I am in your debt.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
789
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K