Admissions Switching from grad quantitative psych to physics: is it possible?

AI Thread Summary
Switching from a quantitative psychology PhD to a physics PhD is feasible, especially given the background in physics and cognitive modeling. Concerns arise about perceptions of commitment and the implications of leaving a program after three years. Completing the current PhD may limit future admissions to another program, as committees might view it as a lack of focus. A potential solution is to pursue a thesis that bridges both fields, leveraging existing coursework and research. Ultimately, demonstrating a clear rationale for the switch and a solid academic foundation can enhance competitiveness in physics applications.
MountainMan97
Messages
1
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone. I'm currently a 3rd year quantitative/mathematical/cognitive psychology graduate student in a PhD program finishing my masters after this semester. In it, I'm using the mathematics of quantum mechanics to model cognitive phenomena. I was accepted into a physics PhD program as an undergraduate, but I chose to attend my current PhD program instead due to life circumstances and stuck with it. Working with all of the physics math and physicists I do, I've realized and decided staunchly that I'm meant to do physics instead.

I did physics, psychology, and philosophy as an undergraduate. I had a second-author publication in physics as an undergraduate in QIS, a 3.34 physics GPA, and a 3.65 cumulative GPA. That's with some other various awards and such. Do you think it's possible to still switch to a physics PhD program? Would I be a more competitive candidate in a masters program? Or will committees think I'm being wishy-washy (which, admittedly, I was in undergrad). But supposing that I could argue a convincing case, would my stats and masters likely end me up in the reject pile?

Thanks so much!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you were admitted to a physics PhD program 3 years ago, I don't see how you would be any worse off because you chose to pursue a PhD in something else in the meantime.
 
I am going to disagree with Choppy.

Here are the horns of the dilemma you are on. If you finish your current PhD, very very few places will admit you to another ones. A PhD is supposed to mean that you are an expert in whatever you say you're an expert in, so why get another one? On the other hand, if you drop out of the program after 3 years, you look, to use your words "wishy washy". The committee will probably use other words, like "likely to bail on us as well" and possibly "perpetual student".

Does your school offer a PhD in physics? If so, does the university confer the degree? i.e. is it "Doctor of Philosophy as Recommended by the Department of Physics" instead of "Doctor of Philosophy in Physics"? If so, the path of least resistance is probably to come up with a thesis topic acceptable to both departments and the appropriate course work and shoot for that.
 
What does "do Physics" mean? I would argue that "applying quantum mechanics to model cognitive phenomena" is doing Physics. If you were to switch to a Physics PhD program what topic would you be wanting to focus on for your thesis instead?
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50 and berkeman
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
53
Views
7K
Back
Top