MHB Symmetric Graphs: f(x)=3^x and g(x)=(1/3)^x Explained

  • Thread starter Thread starter Fernando Revilla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphs Symmetric
AI Thread Summary
The functions f(x)=3^x and g(x)=(1/3)^x are indeed symmetrical with respect to the y-axis. This symmetry is demonstrated by the relationship where g(x) can be expressed as g(x)=3^{-x}, indicating that for every point (x,y) on the graph of f, there is a corresponding point (-x,y) on the graph of g. The discussion clarifies that both functions mirror each other, confirming their symmetrical nature. Understanding this relationship is crucial for analyzing their graphs effectively. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of recognizing the symmetry in these exponential functions.
Fernando Revilla
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
631
Reaction score
0
I quote a question from Yahoo! Answers

f(x)=3^x and g(x)=(1/3)^x I put that they mirror each other, that they are symmetrical. I am obviously missing something important between the two

I have given a link to the topic there so the OP can see my response.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Denote $f(x)=3^x$ and $g(x)=(1/3)^x=1/3^x=3^{-x}$ and $\Gamma (f)$, $\Gamma (g)$ their respective graphs. Then, $$(x,y)\in\Gamma (f)\Leftrightarrow y=3^x \Leftrightarrow y=3^{-(-x)}\Leftrightarrow (-x,y)\in \Gamma (g)$$ This means that $f$ and $g$ are symmetrical with respect to the $y$-axis.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top