MHB Symmetry in the algebraic expressions

Click For Summary
The expression $(x+a+b)(x+b+c)(x+c+a)$ exhibits symmetry in the variables a, b, and c, meaning that switching any two of these variables does not change the overall expression. This is referred to as "cyclic symmetry," where the expression remains invariant under cyclic permutations of the variables. However, it is also described as "fully symmetric," which is a stronger condition; in this case, swapping any pair of variables results in the same expression. An example of a non-fully symmetric expression is $(a - b)(b - c)(c - a)$, which changes sign when two variables are swapped. Understanding these symmetries is crucial for analyzing algebraic expressions and their properties.
NotaMathPerson
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Hello!

I read about the symmetry of the following product

$(x+a+b)(x+b+c)(x+c+a)$ my book says that a, b and c occur symmetrically. Why is that?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
NotaMathPerson said:
Hello!

I read about the symmetry of the following product

$(x+a+b)(x+b+c)(x+c+a)$ my book says that a, b and c occur symmetrically. Why is that?

This is also called "cyclic symmetry" and it simply means that if you switch the two variables in any of the 3 pairs in $(a,b,c)$, you still have the same expression. Try it to verify. :)
 
Actually, it's "fully symmetric" which is *different* than cyclic symmetry. To see the difference, consider:

$(a - b)(b - c)(c - a)$

If we send $a \to b \to c \to a$, we get:

$(b - c)(c - a)(a - b)$, which is the same expression (even though the factors are in a different order).

If we just switch $a$ and $b$, we get

$(b - a)(a - c)(c - b) = -(a - b)(b - c)(c - a)$, which is *not* the original expression, but its negative.

That is-if we can swap any pair and get the original expression, it is fully symmetric (permutations are generated by pair-swaps), full symmetry implies cyclic symmetry, but the reverse is not so.

(Note that $(a - b)(b - c)(c - a)$ also remains unchanged under the transformation $a \to c \to b \to a$ which gives:

$(c - a)(a - b)(b - c)$).

The transformation (substitution) $a \to b \to c \to a$ is called a 3-cycle, as it changes 3 things to something else, and repeating it three times "completes the cycle" and leaves you where you were.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K