MHB T20 Suppose that A is a square matrix of size n and ......

  • Thread starter Thread starter karush
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Square
karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1g7fjWAUEpOo2NukqFqZI4Wrujud6sjbn/view?usp=sharing

$\tiny{4.288.T20}$
Suppose that A is a square matrix of size n and $\alpha \in \CC$ is $\alpha$ scalar.
Prove that $\det{\alpha A} = \alpha^n\det{A}$.
Using $\alpha=5$
$\det{5A}=\det\left(5\left[
\begin{array}{rrr}
1&2\\3&4
\end{array} \right]\right)
=\det\left[
\begin{array}{rrr}
5&10\\15&20
\end{array} \right]=-50
$
$5^2\det{A}=5^2\det\left[
\begin{array}{rrr}
1&2\\3&4
\end{array} \right]
=\left[\begin{array}{cc} 25 & 50 \\ 75 & 100 \end{array} \right]=(25)(-50)$

Solution: $aA$ can be obtained from A by elementary row operations %of type II.
$\alpha A = E_1 \cdots E_n A$
where E, is the corresponding elementary matrix that multiplies the i-th row by the constant a.
It follows that
$\det{\alpha A}= \det{E_i}\cdots \det{E_n} \det(A)=\alpha^n\det{A} $ok I obviouly tried to follow the example above (link) but not quite sure I got the message on it...:unsure:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem is asking you to prove this for any positive integer, n. You cannot just show it for n= 5. I would probably use "induction on n". When n= 1 this "n by n matrix" is just a number, a. Then $det(\alpha A)= \alpha a= \alpha^1 det(A)$.

Now suppose that for A any "k by k" matrix, it is true that $det(\alpha A)= \alpha^k det(A)$ and consider B, an arbitrary k+1 by k+ 1 matrix. Calculate $det(\alpha A)$ by "expansion on the first row. You get a sum of k+ 1 terms, each a product of a number, which will be multiplied by $\alpha$, times the determinant of a k by k matrix.
 
Last edited:
thanks that helped a lot...

I always have a :unsure::unsure:with proofs
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K