Taking the derivative of position to get velocity

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the process of taking the derivative of a position function to determine velocity, with specific focus on the implications of units and the interpretation of the results. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the term "1/s" and how it relates to the overall problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the meaning of the term "1/s" and its relation to the units of the problem. There is exploration of the need for a specific time to calculate velocity, and questions arise about the interpretation of angles and their units in the context of the problem.

Discussion Status

Several participants provide insights into the units involved and the need for clarity on the time at which velocity should be calculated. There is an ongoing exchange of attempts to derive the correct expression for velocity, with some participants noting the importance of considering vector components.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of potential confusion regarding the use of radians versus degrees, as well as the need for specific coefficients in the derivative calculations. The problem appears to involve a time-dependent function where velocity is not constant.

heartshapedbox
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem is hopefully attached, I had to take a screen shot.

Homework Equations


I understand the process of taking the derivative of position to get velocity.
*refer to derivative rules... for example r(x)=2x^2-6x+8 therefore r`(x)=4x-6

The Attempt at a Solution


I am stuck with what to do with the "1/s"

The correct answer is 2.8m/s

Thank you so much in advance.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2016-02-12 at 8.52.03 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2016-02-12 at 8.52.03 PM.png
    18 KB · Views: 588
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the 1/s terms are just a confusing way of showing that the constant (0.74) has units of s-1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: heartshapedbox and gracy
I may be wrong but here is what I think - To take cosine, sine etc. you need to have an angle. Clearly it is changing in the equation -as shown- with time. say at time equals to one second - (notice that second in denominator and that of time are going to vanish with each other) - the angle is equals to 0.74 (degrees/ rads/ sterdians etc.) But I need to know what is - m- and also speed is not constant - you must have been asked to find speed(*read velocity) at a particular time.
 
Umrao said:
the angle is equals to 0.74 (degrees/ rads/ sterdians etc.)
No, the .74 is a rate, radians per second, but radians are considered dimensionless, so it can be written as just s-1.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Umrao
It's the unit. Notice the m is also there, standing for "meters". But if you take the derivative you'll get an expression that still depends on "t", so I don't see how one could end up with 2.8 m/s. Velocity is a vector quantity, so, since the answer doesn't include any unit vectors, I suppose the problem asks for the speed. But we would need a given instant of time to get the numeric solution.
 
heartshapedbox said:

Homework Statement


The problem is hopefully attached, I had to take a screen shot

Homework Equations


I understand the process of taking the derivative of position to get velocity.
There's the beginning of your problem! Velocity is the derivative with respect to time
Assuming r(t) has units of "meters" then the derivative, which is the limit of the "difference quotient" has units of "meters per time" as velocity should.

*refer to derivative rules... for example r(x)=2x^2-6x+8 therefore r`(x)=4x-6

The Attempt at a Solution


I am stuck with what to do with the "1/s"

The correct answer is 2.8m/s

Thank you so much in advance.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: heartshapedbox
HallsofIvy said:
There's the beginning of your problem! Velocity is the derivative with respect to time
i see no evidence that hsb was trying to do otherwise, nor for any issue over units.
 
What I'm not seeing is at which point in time you're supposed to calculate the velocity... The velocity changes with time, and without knowing when to 'measure' it, we can't find a numerical answer, just the formula
 
Thank you everyone for your help.
When I take the derivative of the position vector I get:

(-sin(0.74t)0.74)+(cos(0.74t)0.74)
Then say at time 1.5, where the answer should equal 2.8m/s I get

(-sin(0.74x1.5)0.74)+(cos(0.74x1.5)0.74)

which equals
-0.014+0.7397
=0.7257

Where am I messing up?
 
  • #10
You are messing up in two ways. You are omitting the 3 m and the 6 m coefficients. And the i and j represent unit vectors in the x and y directions. So both the displacement and the velocity have x and y components. To get the magnitude of the velocity, you need to consider the vector sum of the two components (using the Pythagorean theorem).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: heartshapedbox
  • #11
Thank you Chester. I'm STILL stuck though ahah :(

new attempt:

(3)(-sin(0.74t)0.74)+(0)(cos(0.74t)+(6)(cos(0.74t)0.74)+(0)(sin0.74t)
=(3)(-sin(0.74t)0.74)+(6)(cos(0.74t)0.74)
=(3)(-sin(0.74x1.5)0.74)+(6)(cos(0.74x1.5)0.74)
=-0.04+4.44

then, velocity= sqrt(-0.04^2+4.44^2)

I am getting 4.4...not 2.8...

I am so sorry for the trouble ahah
 
  • #12
I get -1.988 i + 1.974 j. That gives 2.8 m/s for v. Are you sure you used radians, and not degrees?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: heartshapedbox
  • #13
oh man...how embarrassing ahaha, that's what I was doing. :( Thank you so very much for your help! This is quite clear now. :) Have a great day! :D Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
6K