Tangent to reparameterized curve

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter monea83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Tangent
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
monea83
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Given is a curve [tex]\gamma[/tex] from [tex]\mathbb{R} \rightarrow M[/tex] for some manifold M. The tangent to [tex]\gamma[/tex] at [tex]c[/tex] is defined as

[tex](\gamma_*c)g = \frac{dg \circ {\gamma}}{du}(c)[/tex]

Now, the curve is to be reparameterized so that [tex]\tau = \gamma \circ f[/tex], with f defining the reparametrization. (f' > 0 everywhere)

The book I'm reading claims that [tex]\tau_* = f' \cdot \gamma_* \circ f[/tex], however I do not quite see how this result is derived.

Using the chain rule, I get

[tex] (\tau_*c)g = \frac{dg \circ \gamma \circ f}{du}(c) =\frac{dg \circ \gamma \circ f}{df} \cdot \frac{df}{du}(c)[/tex]

The second part of the rhs is obviously f', but how is the first part equal to [tex]\gamma_* \circ f[/tex]?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation is really bad. Try this:

The tangent to [tex]\gamma[/tex] at [tex]\gamma(u_0)[/tex] is the tangent vector [tex]\gamma_{*,u_0}[/tex] defined by

[tex] (\gamma_{*,u_0})g := \frac{d(g \circ {\gamma})}{du}(u_0)[/tex]

So, for [tex]\tau:= \gamma \circ f[/tex] a reparametrization, the chain rule yields

[tex] (\tau_{*,t_0})g = \frac{d(g \circ \gamma \circ f)}{dt}(t_0) =\frac{d(g \circ \gamma)}{du}(f(t_0)) \frac{df}{dt}(t_0)=f'(t_0)(\gamma_{*,f(t_0)})g[/tex]

That is to say,

[tex]\tau_{*,t_0}=f'(t_0)\cdot \gamma_{*,f(t_0)}[/tex]

for all t_0.

Or, even more compactly,

[tex]\tau_*=f'\cdot \gamma_{*}\circ f[/tex]

I highly recommend the book Introduction to Smooth Manifolds by John Lee.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much, I think I can work it out now!

When you say my notation is bad, are you referring to my application of the chain rule (which I believe is flawed), or to the notation in which the problem was posed (which was taken from "Tensor analysis on manifolds", Bishop & Goldberg)?