Curves and tangent vectors in a manifold setting

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the definition and implications of smooth curves in a manifold setting, specifically how they relate to tangent vectors. A smooth curve in a manifold M is defined as a map γ: I → M, where I is an open interval in ℝ, and for any chart (U, φ), the composition φ ∘ γ is smooth. The derivative of a smooth function f: M → ℝ along a curve γ is expressed using the chain rule, leading to the equation $$\frac{d}{dt}f(\gamma(t)) = \sum_{i=1}^n \left(\frac{\partial (f \circ \phi^{-1})}{\partial x^i}\right)_{\phi(\gamma(t))} \frac{d}{dt} x^i(\gamma(t))$$. Understanding this equation requires familiarity with the chain rule and the notation used in differential geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of manifold theory and smooth maps
  • Familiarity with differential calculus in multiple dimensions
  • Knowledge of the chain rule in calculus
  • Basic concepts of tangent vectors in differential geometry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of smooth functions on manifolds
  • Learn about the application of the chain rule in differential geometry
  • Explore the concept of tangent vectors and their geometric interpretations
  • Investigate the relationship between coordinate charts and smoothness in manifolds
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying differential geometry, particularly those interested in the analysis of curves and tangent vectors within manifold theory.

CAF123
Gold Member
Messages
2,918
Reaction score
87
Consider the following definition: (##M## denotes a manifold structure, ##U## are subsets of the manifold and ##\phi## the transition functions)

Def: A smooth curve in ##M## is a map ##\gamma: I \rightarrow M,## where ##I \subset \mathbb{R}## is an open interval, such that for any chart ##(U,\phi)##, the map ##\phi \circ \gamma : I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n## is smooth.

My first question is, why do we define a smooth curve in this way? In particular, why is the map ##\phi \circ \gamma## a good object to consider? The only thing that comes to mind is that now we have a function defined from ##\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n## so differentiation is well defined and thus one may introduce the concept of a tangent vector (as below).

Now let ##f: M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}## be a smooth function on ##M## and ##\gamma: I \rightarrow M##, smooth curve as before. Then ##f \circ \gamma : I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}## is smooth. Hence we take a derivative to find the rate of change of ##f## along the curve ##\gamma##: $$\frac{d}{dt}f(\gamma(t)) = [(f \circ \phi^{-1}) \circ (\phi \circ \gamma)]'(t) = \sum_{i=1}^n \left(\frac{\partial (f \circ \phi^{-1})}{\partial x^i}\right)_{\phi(\gamma(t))} \frac{d}{dt} x^i(\gamma(t))$$

My next question is to simply understand how this equation comes about. I can see it is some application of the chain rule but I am struggling with the precise details of the equation, mostly in how the final equality comes about and the subscript on the ##\partial (f \circ \phi^{-1})/\partial x^i## term. Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CAF123 said:
My first question is, why do we define a smooth curve in this way?
It allows us to do essentially everything on a smooth curve on a manifold that you can do with a smooth curve in Rn. (You can also check that the definition is coordinate independent.) To quote one of my undergrad teachers (linear algebra, not differential geometry): "It is not silly, it is a definition. It may be a silly definition, but you simply have to live with it."

CAF123 said:
My next question is to simply understand how this equation comes about. I can see it is some application of the chain rule but I am struggling with the precise details of the equation, mostly in how the final equality comes about and the subscript on the ##\partial (f \circ \phi^{-1})/\partial x^i## term. Many thanks!

##f\circ \phi^{-1}## is a function from the coordinate chart ##U## to ##\mathbb R## and it therefore has a dependence on the coordinates ##x^i##, which is what you differentiate this function with respect to. The full function you have is a composition of a function from ##\mathbb R## to ##\mathbb R^n## and a function from ##\mathbb R^n## to ##\mathbb R## and you therefore can apply the chain rule (##x^i(\gamma(t))## are simply the coordinate functions evaluated at the curve for some ##t##).
 
CAF123 said:
Consider the following definition: (##M## denotes a manifold structure, ##U## are subsets of the manifold and ##\phi## the transition functions)

Def: A smooth curve in ##M## is a map ##\gamma: I \rightarrow M,## where ##I \subset \mathbb{R}## is an open interval, such that for any chart ##(U,\phi)##, the map ##\phi \circ \gamma : I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n## is smooth.

My first question is, why do we define a smooth curve in this way? In particular, why is the map ##\phi \circ \gamma## a good object to consider? The only thing that comes to mind is that now we have a function defined from ##\mathbb{R} \rightarrow \mathbb{R}^n## so differentiation is well defined and thus one may introduce the concept of a tangent vector (as below).
Smoothness of functions between subsets of ##\mathbb R^n## is defined as "differentiable infinitely many times". When we define smoothness of functions between manifolds, we want the new kind of smoothness to be related to the old. Since a manifold is covered by the domains of a bunch of smoothly compatible coordinate systems (such that ##x\circ y^{-1}## is smooth for all coordinate systems x,y), it's very natural to define ##f:M\to N## to be smooth when ##x\circ f\circ y^{-1}## is smooth for all coordinate systems x on N and y on M.

CAF123 said:
Now let ##f: M \rightarrow \mathbb{R}## be a smooth function on ##M## and ##\gamma: I \rightarrow M##, smooth curve as before. Then ##f \circ \gamma : I \rightarrow \mathbb{R}## is smooth. Hence we take a derivative to find the rate of change of ##f## along the curve ##\gamma##: $$\frac{d}{dt}f(\gamma(t)) = [(f \circ \phi^{-1}) \circ (\phi \circ \gamma)]'(t) = \sum_{i=1}^n \left(\frac{\partial (f \circ \phi^{-1})}{\partial x^i}\right)_{\phi(\gamma(t))} \frac{d}{dt} x^i(\gamma(t))$$

My next question is to simply understand how this equation comes about. I can see it is some application of the chain rule but I am struggling with the precise details of the equation, mostly in how the final equality comes about and the subscript on the ##\partial (f \circ \phi^{-1})/\partial x^i## term. Many thanks!
The chain rule can be written ##(f\circ g)_{,i}(x)=f_{,j}(g(x)) g^j{}_{,i}(x)## when ##f## is real-valued. If the domain of ##g## is a subset of ##\mathbb R##, we can simplify this to ##(f\circ g)'(x)=f_{,j}(g(x))(g^j)'(x)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K